ArticleJournal of biosciences2010
Flanking region sequence information to refine microRNA target predictions.
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive analysis of computational approaches in plant transcription factors binding regions discovery.Heliyon · 2024Article
- AcMNPV-miR-2 affectsJournal of virology · 2024Article
- PTFSpot: deep co-learning on transcription factors and their binding regions attains impeccable universality in plants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- microRNA-20-1 and microRNA-101a Suppress the NF-κB-Mediated Inflammation Production by Targeting TRAF6 in Miiuy Croaker.Infection and immunity · 2022Article
- RBPSpot: Learning on appropriate contextual information for RBP binding sites discovery.iScience · 2021Article
- Differential miRNA Expression in Human Macrophage-Like Cells Infected withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Inducible microRNA-21 Negatively Modulates the Inflammatory Response in Teleost Fish via Targeting IRAK4.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- TLR3 Ligand Poly(I:C) Exerts Distinct Actions in Synovial Fibroblasts When Delivered by Extracellular Vesicles.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Inducible microRNA-214 contributes to the suppression of NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response via targetingThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- A legion of potential regulatory sRNAs exists beyond the typical microRNAs microcosm.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Chronic morphine-induced microRNA-124 promotes microglial immunosuppression by modulating P65 and TRAF6.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015Article
- MicroRNA target prediction: theory and practice.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2014Article
- Cellular microRNAs and picornaviral infections.RNA biology · 2014Review
- MicroRNA-146a: A Dominant, Negative Regulator of the Innate Immune Response.Frontiers in immunology · 2014Review
- MicroRNA roles in the NF- κB signaling pathway during viral infections.BioMed research international · 2014Review
- Article
- MicroRNAs in the regulation of TLR and RIG-I pathways.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2013Review
- MiRNAs and LincRNAs: Could they be considered as biomarkers in colorectal cancer?International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Review
- Article
- MicroRNAs: the fine-tuners of Toll-like receptor signalling.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The non-coding elements of a genome, with many of them considered as junk earlier, have now started gaining long due respectability, with microRNAs as the best current example. MicroRNAs bind preferentially to the 3' untranslated regions 9UTRs) of the target genes and negatively regulate their expression most of the time. Several microRNA: target prediction softwares have been developed based upon various assumptions and the majority of them consider the free energy of binding of a target to its microRNA and seed conservation. However, the average concordance between the predictions made by these softwares is limited and compounded by a large number of false-positive results. In this study, we describe a methodology developed by us to refine microRNA: target prediction by target prediction softwares through observations made from a comprehensive study. We incorporated the information obtained from dinucleotide content variation patterns recorded for flanking regions around the target sites using support vector machines (SVMs) trained over two different major sources of experimental data, besides other sources. We assessed the performance of our methodology with rigorous tests over four different dataset models and also compared it with a recently published refinement tool, MirTif. Our methodology attained a higher average accuracy of 0.88, average sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 and 0.94, respectively, and areas under the curves (AUCs) for all the four models scored above 0.9, suggesting better performance by our methodology and a possible role of flanking regions in microRNA targeting control. We used our methodology over genes of three different pathways--toll-like receptor (TLR), apoptosis and insulin--to finally predict the most probable targets. We also investigated their possible regulatory associations, and identified a hsa-miR-23a regulatory module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.