Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20413522›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2010

Infliximab for diabetic macular edema refractory to laser photocoagulation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, 32-week study.

Petros P Sfikakis, Vlassis Grigoropoulos, Ioannis Emfietzoglou, George Theodossiadis, Nicholas Tentolouris, Evi Delicha, Christina Katsiari, Kleopatra Alexiadou, Erifili Hatziagelaki, Panayiotis G Theodossiadis

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in anti-tnf treated rheumatic disease patients with type 2 diabetes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The innate immune system in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  16. Recent Advancements in the Medical Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Evolving Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
  20. The role of inflammation in diabetic eye disease.Seminars in immunopathology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petros P SfikakisFirst Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece. psfikakis@med.uoa.gr
Vlassis Grigoropoulos
Ioannis Emfietzoglou
George Theodossiadis
Nicholas Tentolouris
Evi Delicha
Christina Katsiari
Kleopatra Alexiadou
Erifili Hatziagelaki
Panayiotis G Theodossiadis
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GRHenry Dunant Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBecause many patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) do not respond to focal/grid laser photocoagulation, the only currently approved treatment, alternatives are needed. Based on encouraging preliminary findings, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody infliximab in this condition. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Eleven patients with sight-threatening DME persisting after two sessions of laser photocoagulation received infliximab (5 mg/kg) intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14, followed by placebo at weeks 16, 18, 22, and 30, or vice versa. Blinding was maintained to week 32, when the final assessments were performed. Best corrected visual acuity evaluated by a mixed-models approach for imbalanced crossover design using the percentage difference as the outcome variable was the primary study end point. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

resultsEarly Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores dropped from 31.6 +/- 5.1 (mean +/- SD) letters read at baseline to 28.8 +/- 11.6 letters read at week 16 in six placebo-treated eyes and improved to 35.4 +/- 11.2 letters read after infliximab. In contrast, visual acuity improved from 23.5 +/- 10.3 at baseline to 30.4 +/- 13.4 letters read at week 16 in eight infliximab-treated eyes and was sustained at completion of placebo treatment (31.4 +/- 12.1 letters read). The excess visual acuity in infliximab-treated eyes was greater by 24.3% compared with that in placebo-treated eyes (95% CI 4.8-43.7; P = 0.017). Infliximab treatment was well tolerated.

conclusionsThe positive results of this small phase III study suggest that larger and longer term trials should be conducted to assess the efficacy of systemic or intravitreal anti-TNF agent administration for primary treatment of DME.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCross-Over StudiesDiabetic RetinopathyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfliximabLaser CoagulationMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsInfliximabPlacebosTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID20413522
PMCPMC2890353
OpenAlexW2166438103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.