Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20412870›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2010

Degeneracy as a substrate for respiratory regulation.

Nicholas M Mellen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Consequences of degeneracy in network function.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Distinct inspiratory rhythm and pattern generating mechanisms in the preBötzinger complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  11. The cellular building blocks of breathing.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012
    Review
  12. Pontine mechanisms of respiratory control.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicholas M MellenKosair Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Louisville, 570 S. Preston Street, Baxter Building 1, Suite 304, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. nicholas.mellen@louisville.edu

Funding

Respiratory Reflexes In VitroR01HL068007 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MELLEN, NICHOLAS M · 2001 to 2008
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL068007NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies in vivo and in vitro suggest that both respiratory rhythmogenesis and its central chemosensory modulation arise from multiple, mechanistically and/or anatomically distinct networks whose outputs are similar. These observations are consistent with degeneracy, defined as the ability of structurally distinct elements to generate similar function. This review argues that degeneracy is an essential feature of respiratory networks, ensuring the survival of the individual organism over the course of development, and accounting for the transformation of respiratory biomechanics over evolutionary time. At faster timescales, respiration must adapt continuously and rapidly to changes in metabolic demand and ambient conditions to maintain blood-gas homeostasis. Control theory, which formalizes homeostasis, states axiomatically that rapid responsiveness can only be achieved with high gain, but high gain comes at the cost of instability. Homeostatic systems displaying highly optimized tolerance (HOT) mitigate the instability accompanying high gain by incorporating regulatory mechanisms that provide protection against expected perturbations, yet these systems remain fragile to catastrophic failure in response to rare events. Because the multiple mechanisms that are conjectured to mediate respiratory rhythmogenesis and chemosensation have distinct ranges of activity and responses to modulatory input, they provide a richer substrate for respiratory regulation than those of any single mechanism. Respiration, though robust, remains fragile to rare perturbations, matching a key feature of HOT. These observations support the conclusion that degeneracy provides the substrate for respiratory regulation, and that the resulting regulatory system conforms to HOT.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHomeostasisModels, BiologicalRespirationAnimalsChemoreceptor CellsHumansMedulla OblongataNerve NetPeriodicity

Identifiers

PMID20412870
PMCPMC2885560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.