Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20412590›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Origin and fate of pseudogenes in Hemiascomycetes: a comparative analysis.

Ingrid Lafontaine, Bernard Dujon

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Endogenous miRNA Sponges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. GENCODE Pseudogenes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  5. Computational Methods for Pseudogene Annotation Based on Sequence Homology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  6. A gene graveyard in the genome of the fungus Podospora comata.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pseudogenes and Their Genome-Wide Prediction in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Yeast evolutionary genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid LafontaineUnité de Génétique Moléculaire des Levures, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. ingrid.lafontaine@pasteur.fr
Bernard Dujon
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudogenes are ubiquitous genetic elements that derive from functional genes after mutational inactivation. Characterization of pseudogenes is important to understand genome dynamics and evolution, and its significance increases when several genomes of related organisms can be compared. Among yeasts, only the genome of the S. cerevisiae reference strain has been analyzed so far for pseudogenes.

resultsWe present here the first comparative analysis of pseudogenes within the fully sequenced and annotated genomes of eight yeast species, spanning the entire phylogenetic range of Hemiascomycetes. A total of 871 pseudogenes were found, out of which mutational degradation patterns and consequences on the genetic repertoire of each species could be identified. We found that most pseudogenes in yeasts originate from mutational degradation of gene copies formed after species-specific duplications but duplications of pseudogenes themselves are also encountered. In all yeasts, except in Y. lipolytica, pseudogenes tend to cluster in subtelomeric regions where they can outnumber the number of functional genes from 3 to 16 times. Pseudogenes are generally not conserved between the yeast species studied (except in two cases), consistent with their large evolutionary distances, but tend to be conserved among S. cerevisiae strains. Reiterated pseudogenization of some genes is often observed in different lineages and may affect functions essential in S. cerevisiae, which are, therefore, lost in other species. Although a variety of functions are affected by pseudogenization, there is a bias towards functions involved in the adaptation of the yeasts to their environment, and towards genes of unknown functions.

conclusionsOur work illustrates for the first time the formation of pseudogenes in different branches of hemiascomycetous yeasts, showing their limited conservation and how they testify for the adaptation of the yeasts functional repertoires.

Indexed as

PseudogenesAmino Acid SequenceCandida glabrataGene DuplicationMolecular Sequence DataSaccharomycetalesSequence AlignmentSynteny

Identifiers

PMID20412590
PMCPMC2876123
OpenAlexW2057196800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.