ArticleVeterinary research communications2010
A one-step real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction detection of classical swine fever virus using a minor groove binding probe.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a one-step real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay using the minor groove binding probe (MGB rRT-PCR) for rapid and quantitative detection of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). The method, which targets the 5'-nontranslated region (5'NTR) of the viral genome, detected all CSFV isolate tested, but not heterologous pathogens. Using an in vitro transcript of the 5'NTR as a quantitative standard for the CSFV genome copy number, the assay had a detection limit of 10 copies/reaction, and the standard curve had a linear range from 10 to 10(7) copies/reaction, with good reproducibility. As determined by an end-point dilution comparison, in most case, the sensitivity of the MGB rRT-PCR was approximately 10-fold higher than that of virus isolation and the rRT-PCR using the standard Taqman probe (standard rRT-PCR). The agreement between the MGB rRT-PCR and standard rRT-PCR, or virus isolation was 93.3% and 76.7%, respectively, when detecting 261 field samples. Due to its rapidity, high specificity and sensitivity, the MGB rRT-PCR assay provides a valuable tool for diagnosis and molecular studies of CSFV biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20411415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.