Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20411369›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicity research2011

Stereotypic progressions in psychotic behavior.

Richard M Kostrzewa, John P Kostrzewa, Rose Anna Kostrzewa, Florence P Kostrzewa, Ryszard Brus, Przemyslaw Nowak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard M KostrzewaDepartment of Pharmacology, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, PO Box 70577, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA. kostrzew@etsu.edu
John P Kostrzewa
Rose Anna Kostrzewa
Florence P Kostrzewa
Ryszard Brus
Przemyslaw Nowak
East Tennessee State University · USMedical University of Silesia · PLUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine receptor supersensitivity (DARSS) often is invoked as a mechanism possibly underlying disordered thought processes and agitation states in psychiatric disorders. This review is focused on identified means for producing DARSS and associating the role of other monoaminergic systems in modulating DARSS. Dopamine (DA) receptors, experimentally, are prone to become supersensitive and to thus elicit abnormal behaviors when coupled with DA or a receptor agonist. In intact (control) rats repeated DA D₁ agonist treatments fail to sensitize D₁ receptors, while repeated D₂ agonist treatments sensitize D₂ receptors. D₂ RSS is attenuated by a lesion with DSP-4 (N-(2-chlorethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine) in early postnatal ontogeny, indicating that noradrenergic nerves have a permissive effect on D₂ DARSS. However, if DSP-4 is co-administered with 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine to destroy serotonin (5-HT) nerves, then D₂ RSS is restored. In rats treated early in postnatal ontogeny with the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine to largely destroy DA innervation of striatum, both repeated D₁ and D₂ agonists sensitize D₁ receptors. 5-HT nerves appear to have a permissive effect on D₁ DARSS, as a 5-HT lesion reduces the otherwise enhanced effect of a D₁ agonist. The series of findings demonstrate that DARSS is able to be produced by repeated agonist treatments, albeit under different circumstances. The involvement of other neuronal phenotypes as modulators of DARSS provides the potential for targeting a variety of sites in the aim to prevent or attenuate DARSS. This therapeutic potential broadens the realm of approaches toward treating psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAnimalsDopamine AgonistsHumansPsychotic DisordersReceptors, DopamineStereotyped BehaviorDopamine AgonistsReceptors, Dopamine

Identifiers

PMID20411369
OpenAlexW2069921641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.