Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20410932›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2010

Therapeutic levels of erythropoietin (EPO) achieved after gene electrotransfer to skin in mice.

A Gothelf, P Hojman, J Gehl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Direct Current Helium Plasma forPlasma medicine · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Electro-gene transfer to skin using a noninvasive multielectrode array.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A GothelfDepartment of Oncology 54B1, Center for Experimental Drug and Gene Electrotransfer, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
P Hojman
J Gehl
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene electrotransfer refers to gene transfection by electroporation and is an effective non-viral method for delivering naked DNA into cells and tissues. This study presents data from gene electrotransfer with erythropoietin (EPO) to mouse skin. Nine-week-old female NMRI mice received one, two or three intradermal injections of 50 microg EPO plasmid and were subsequently electroporated. With plate electrodes and 100 microg of EPO, a significant increase in hemoglobin (P<0.01) was observed compared with controls. The level of hemoglobin peaked after 5 weeks but stayed significantly elevated for more than 3 months. Serum EPO was significantly increased (P<0.001) 24 h after the transfection and remained significantly different compared with controls until the maximum level of serum EPO was reached after 2 weeks. Eight weeks after the transfection serum EPO returned to baseline. In this study, we have established that gene electrotransfer to skin of even small amounts of DNA can lead to systemically therapeutic levels of protein. This means that in addition to DNA vaccinations, there is a potential utility for electroporation in alleviating systemic diseases such as cancer and protein deficiency disorders.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAnimalsDNAErythropoietinFemaleGenetic TherapyHemoglobinsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsTransfectionDNAErythropoietinHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID20410932
OpenAlexW2086723977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.