Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20409482›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Predicting secondary structural folding kinetics for nucleic acids.

Peinan Zhao, Wen-Bing Zhang, Shi-Jie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computational modeling of cotranscriptional RNA folding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Cotranscriptional Folding Kinetics For Riboswitch.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Methods for Modeling Aptamers and Designing Riboswitches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peinan ZhaoDepartment of Physics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wen-Bing Zhang
Shi-Jie Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a new computational approach to the prediction of RNA secondary structure folding kinetics. In this approach, each elementary kinetic step is represented as the transformation between two secondary structures that differ by a helix. Based on the free energy landscape analysis, we identify three types of dominant pathways and the rate constants for the kinetic steps: 1), formation; 2), disruption of a helix stem; and 3), helix formation with concomitant partial melting of a competing (incompatible) helix. The third pathway, termed the tunneling pathway, is the low-barrier dominant pathway for the conversion between two incompatible helices. Comparisons with experimental data indicate that this new method is quite reliable in predicting the kinetics for RNA secondary structural folding and structural rearrangements. The approach presented here may provide a robust first step for further systematic development of a predictive theory for the folding kinetics for large RNAs.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase SequenceKineticsMolecular Sequence DataNucleic AcidsThermodynamicsNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID20409482
PMCPMC2856163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.