Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20409476›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Quantifying subpixel accuracy: an experimental method for measuring accuracy in image-correlation-based, single-particle tracking.

Christopher D Saunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mitochondrial motility and vascular smooth muscle proliferation.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2012
    Article
  6. Motion analysis of live objects by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher D SaunterDepartment of Physics, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. christopher.saunter@durham.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-particle tracking (SPT) is a range of powerful analysis techniques that measure particle motion from video microscopy image sequences. SPT is used to study the behavior of motor proteins and associated organelle transport within a cell. Many SPT algorithms deliver subpixel accurate measurements with noisy data corresponding to sub-10-nm resolution. Image-correlation techniques have been shown to be the most accurate method of tracking extended objects. However, to date, it has not been possible to determine the level of error when measuring the motion of an arbitrary particle with this method. In this article we derive a method for experimentally determining the accuracy of image-correlation-based SPT. We then apply this technique to a series of confocal fluorescence microscope image sequences of mitochondria, demonstrating the possibility of making measurements accurate to 5 nm when working with extended objects within live cells. In doing so we show that for particles with a low signal/noise ratio, the accuracy can vary by a factor of 2, corresponding to different particle shapes for a given signal/noise ratio. Use of the presented technique will allow researchers to quantify the accuracy of their measurements on a per-particle basis. This in turn will allow the selection of the most accurately tracked particles, helping to push the accuracy of spatial measurements well below the diffraction limit. This is particularly important for the study of molecular motors whose step size is a similar scale to these limits.

Indexed as

Biological TransportComputer SimulationImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMitochondria

Identifiers

PMID20409476
PMCPMC2856138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.