ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Quantifying subpixel accuracy: an experimental method for measuring accuracy in image-correlation-based, single-particle tracking.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The spatial resolution limit of phagocytosis.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Nanoscale Tracking Combined with Cell-Scale Microrheology Reveals Stepwise Increases in Force Generated by Cancer Cell Protrusions.Nano letters · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional localization refinement and motion model parameter estimation for confined single particle tracking under low-light conditions.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Article
- Mitochondrial motility and vascular smooth muscle proliferation.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2012Article
- Motion analysis of live objects by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-particle tracking (SPT) is a range of powerful analysis techniques that measure particle motion from video microscopy image sequences. SPT is used to study the behavior of motor proteins and associated organelle transport within a cell. Many SPT algorithms deliver subpixel accurate measurements with noisy data corresponding to sub-10-nm resolution. Image-correlation techniques have been shown to be the most accurate method of tracking extended objects. However, to date, it has not been possible to determine the level of error when measuring the motion of an arbitrary particle with this method. In this article we derive a method for experimentally determining the accuracy of image-correlation-based SPT. We then apply this technique to a series of confocal fluorescence microscope image sequences of mitochondria, demonstrating the possibility of making measurements accurate to 5 nm when working with extended objects within live cells. In doing so we show that for particles with a low signal/noise ratio, the accuracy can vary by a factor of 2, corresponding to different particle shapes for a given signal/noise ratio. Use of the presented technique will allow researchers to quantify the accuracy of their measurements on a per-particle basis. This in turn will allow the selection of the most accurately tracked particles, helping to push the accuracy of spatial measurements well below the diffraction limit. This is particularly important for the study of molecular motors whose step size is a similar scale to these limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.