ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2010
Core competencies for clinical ethics committees.
Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carrying the Facilitator Responsibility: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Under Training to Become Facilitators of Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Paediatric Oncology.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Exploration of clinical ethics consultation in Uganda: a case study of Uganda Cancer Institute.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants.Journal of medical ethics · 2022Article
- Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON).HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2022Article
- Clinical Ethics Consultations in the Opinion of Polish Physicians.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2021Article
- A Proposed Model of Core Competencies for Research Ethics Consultants.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Challenges of hospital ethics committees: a phenomenological study.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2021Article
- A Guide to Establishing Ethics Committees in Behavioral Health Settings.Behavior analysis in practice · 2020Article
- How to read an ethics paper.Journal of medical ethics · 2018Article
- Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2017Review
- Moral competency: meta-competence of nursing care.Electronic physician · 2017Article
- Trials, Regulation and tribulations.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Are ethics committees in tune with the "epidemiology of ethical issues"?The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2012Article
- Ethics consultation and empathy : finding the balance in clinical settings.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2011Article
- Assessing physicians' roles on health care ethics committees.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical ethics committees (CECs) are increasing in number in the UK and have mostly developed in response to local interest, as opposed to being mandated as in the USA. However, there is no regulatory framework for UK CECs with no defined educational requirements or specification of core competencies for their members. The UK Clinical Ethics Network has consulted extensively with its members to set out, for the first time in the UK, the core competencies necessary for the provision of clinical ethics support. Recommendations for educational and membership requirements for CECs have also been made. Given the appropriate resources the standards proposed can be appropriately evaluated and are consistent with principles of ethical governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.