ArticleGenetics2010
Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.
Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering genetic diversity and selection footprints in Rathi cattle through ddRAD-based genome-wide analysis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Machine learning for evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Genetic Divergence in the Absence of Strong Ecological Differences Between Coexisting White and Common Atlantic Marine Stickleback.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Soft Selective Sweeps Predominate in the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Footprints of Worldwide Adaptation in Structured Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Through the Expanded DEST 2.0 Genomic Resource.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Signatures of soft selective sweeps predominate in the yellow fever mosquitobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Inferring demographic and selective histories from population genomic data using a 2-step approach in species with coding-sparse genomes: an application to human data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Population History Across Timescales in an Urban Archipelago.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Population history across timescales in an urban archipelago.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.Genetics · 2025Article
- Inferring demographic and selective histories from population genomic data using a two-step approach in species with coding-sparse genomes: an application to human data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tree Sequences as a General-Purpose Tool for Population Genetic Inference.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Population Genomic Scans for Natural Selection and Demography.Annual review of genetics · 2024Review
- Tree sequences as a general-purpose tool for population genetic inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Temporal challenges in detecting balancing selection from population genomic data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- A Novel Approach Utilizing Domain Adversarial Neural Networks for the Detection and Classification of Selective Sweeps.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- IntroUNET: Identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Unveiling recent and ongoing adaptive selection in human populations.PLoS biology · 2024Article
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major goal of population genomics is to reconstruct the history of natural populations and to infer the neutral and selective scenarios that can explain the present-day polymorphism patterns. However, the separation between neutral and selective hypotheses has proven hard, mainly because both may predict similar patterns in the genome. This study focuses on the development of methods that can be used to distinguish neutral from selective hypotheses in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. These methods utilize a combination of statistics on the basis of the site frequency spectrum (SFS) and linkage disequilibrium (LD). We investigate the patterns of genetic variation along recombining chromosomes using a multitude of comparisons between neutral and selective hypotheses, such as selection or neutrality in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations and recurrent selection models. We perform hypothesis testing using the classical P-value approach, but we also introduce methods from the machine-learning field. We demonstrate that the combination of SFS- and LD-based statistics increases the power to detect recent positive selection in populations that have experienced past demographic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.