Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20407088›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2010

Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study using food diaries.

Christina C Dahm, Ruth H Keogh, Elizabeth A Spencer, Darren C Greenwood, Tim J Key, Ian S Fentiman, Martin J Shipley, Eric J Brunner, Janet E Cade, Victoria J Burley and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 92 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
25.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin A, C and/or E Intake During Pregnancy and Offspring Respiratory Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Aberrant promoter methylation of the SFRP1 gene may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Does a self-management program change dietary intake in adults with irritable bowel syndrome?Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Associations Between Prescreening Dietary Patterns and Longitudinal Colonoscopy Outcomes in Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Recalibrating the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium Environmental Risk Score for Use in US Veterans.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Christina C DahmDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
Ruth H Keogh
Elizabeth A Spencer
Darren C Greenwood
Tim J Key
Ian S Fentiman
Martin J Shipley
Eric J Brunner
Janet E Cade
Victoria J Burley
Gita Mishra
Alison M Stephen
Diana Kuh
Ian R White
Robert Luben
Marleen A H Lentjes
Kay Tee Khaw
Sheila A Rodwell Bingham
University of Oxford · GBMedical Research Council · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBGuy's Hospital · GBMRC Human Nutrition Research · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674Cancer Research UK C570/A5028Cancer Research UK C/864/A8257Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0401527Medical Research Council g0500300Medical Research Council G0500300Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council g402517Medical Research Council G8802774Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council MC_U105630924Medical Research Council MC_U105960384Medical Research Council MC_U123092725Medical Research Council MC_U123092726Medical Research Council U.1052.00.006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults of epidemiological studies of dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk have not been consistent, possibly because of attenuation of associations due to measurement error in dietary exposure ascertainment.

methodsTo examine the association between dietary fiber intake and colorectal cancer risk, we conducted a prospective case-control study nested within seven UK cohort studies, which included 579 case patients who developed incident colorectal cancer and 1996 matched control subjects. We used standardized dietary data obtained from 4- to 7-day food diaries that were completed by all participants to calculate the odds ratios for colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers with the use of conditional logistic regression models that adjusted for relevant covariates. We also calculated odds ratios for colorectal cancer by using dietary data obtained from food-frequency questionnaires that were completed by most participants. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsIntakes of absolute fiber and of fiber intake density, ascertained by food diaries, were statistically significantly inversely associated with the risks of colorectal and colon cancers in both age-adjusted models and multivariable models that adjusted for age; anthropomorphic and socioeconomic factors; and dietary intakes of folate, alcohol, and energy. For example, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of colorectal cancer for highest vs the lowest quintile of fiber intake density was 0.66 (95% confidence interval = 0.45 to 0.96). However, no statistically significant association was observed when the same analysis was conducted using dietary data obtained by food-frequency questionnaire (multivariable odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.57 to 1.36).

conclusionsIntake of dietary fiber is inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk. Methodological differences (ie, study design, dietary assessment instruments, definition of fiber) may account for the lack of convincing evidence for the inverse association between fiber intake and colorectal cancer risk in some previous studies.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDietary FiberFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsDietary Fiber

Identifiers

PMID20407088
OpenAlexW2167718545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.