Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20406941›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Clinical utility of microarray-based gene expression profiling in the diagnosis and subclassification of leukemia: report from the International Microarray Innovations in Leukemia Study Group.

Torsten Haferlach, Alexander Kohlmann, Lothar Wieczorek, Giuseppe Basso, Geertruy Te Kronnie, Marie-Christine Béné, John De Vos, Jesus M Hernández, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Ken I Mills and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 380 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
380citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

380 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 672 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The M2 macrophage markerOncoimmunology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

320 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Torsten HaferlachMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany. torsten.haferlach@mll-online.com
Alexander Kohlmann
Lothar Wieczorek
Giuseppe Basso
Geertruy Te Kronnie
Marie-Christine Béné
John De Vos
Jesus M Hernández
Wolf-Karsten Hofmann
Ken I Mills
Amanda Gilkes
Sabina Chiaretti
Sheila A Shurtleff
Thomas J Kipps
Laura Z Rassenti
Allen E Yeoh
Peter R Papenhausen
Wei-Min Liu
P Mickey Williams
Robin Foà
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FR

Funding

Tissue CoreP01CA081534 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2016
$59.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Microarray Innovations in Leukemia study assessed the clinical utility of gene expression profiling as a single test to subtype leukemias into conventional categories of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies.

methodsThe investigation was performed in 11 laboratories across three continents and included 3,334 patients. An exploratory retrospective stage I study was designed for biomarker discovery and generated whole-genome expression profiles from 2,143 patients with leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. The gene expression profiling-based diagnostic accuracy was further validated in a prospective second study stage of an independent cohort of 1,191 patients.

resultsOn the basis of 2,096 samples, the stage I study achieved 92.2% classification accuracy for all 18 distinct classes investigated (median specificity of 99.7%). In a second cohort of 1,152 prospectively collected patients, a classification scheme reached 95.6% median sensitivity and 99.8% median specificity for 14 standard subtypes of acute leukemia (eight acute lymphoblastic leukemia and six acute myeloid leukemia classes, n = 693). In 29 (57%) of 51 discrepant cases, the microarray results had outperformed routine diagnostic methods.

conclusionGene expression profiling is a robust technology for the diagnosis of hematologic malignancies with high accuracy. It may complement current diagnostic algorithms and could offer a reliable platform for patients who lack access to today's state-of-the-art diagnostic work-up. Our comprehensive gene expression data set will be submitted to the public domain to foster research focusing on the molecular understanding of leukemias.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemiaMyelodysplastic SyndromesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20406941
PMCPMC5569671
OpenAlexW1994041743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.