Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20406634›Full record

ArticleExperimental cell research2010

Protrusion and actin assembly are coupled to the organization of lamellar contractile structures.

James I Lim, Mohsen Sabouri-Ghomi, Matthias Machacek, Clare M Waterman, Gaudenz Danuser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental cell research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rho family GTPases: making it to the third dimension.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Imaging methodologies for systems biology.Cell adhesion & migration · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mathematical modeling of eukaryotic cell migration: insights beyond experiments.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James I LimDepartment of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Mohsen Sabouri-Ghomi
Matthias Machacek
Clare M Waterman
Gaudenz Danuser
Scripps Research Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Integration of Actin Dynamics and Adhesion in Cell MigrationZIAHL005105 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI WATERMAN, CLARE MICHAL · 2009 to 2025
$16.5M
The Mechanics of Actin-mediated Cell ProtrusionR01GM071868 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI DANUSER, GAUDENZ · 2007 to 2020
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071868NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM71868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directed cell migration requires continuous cycles of protrusion of the leading edge and contraction to pull up the cell rear. How these spatially distributed processes are coordinated to maintain a state of persistent protrusion remains unknown. During wound healing responses of epithelial sheets, cells along the wound edge display two distinct morphologies: 'leader cells' exhibit persistent edge protrusions, while the greater majority of 'follower cells' randomly cycle between protrusion and retraction. Here, we exploit the heterogeneity in cell morphodynamic behaviors to deduce the requirements in terms of cytoskeleton dynamics for persistent and sporadic protrusion events. We used quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (qFSM) to compare rates of F-actin assembly and flow relative to the local protrusion and retraction dynamics of the leading edge. Persistently protruding cells are characterized by contractile actomyosin structures that align with the direction of migration, with converging F-actin flows interpenetrating over a wide band in the lamella. Conversely, non-persistent protruders have their actomyosin structures aligned perpendicular to the axis of migration, and are characterized by prominent F-actin retrograde flows that end into transverse arcs. Analysis of F-actin kinetics in the lamellipodia showed that leader cells have three-fold higher assembly rates when compared to followers. To further investigate a putative relationship between actomyosin contraction and F-actin assembly, myosin II was inhibited by blebbistatin. Treated cells at the wound edge adopted a homogeneously persistent protrusion behavior, with rates matching those of leader cells. Surprisingly, we found that disintegration of actomyosin structures led to a significant decrease in F-actin assembly. Our data suggests that persistent protrusion in these cells is achieved by a reduction in overall F-actin retrograde flow, with lower assembly rates now sufficient to propel forward the leading edge. Based on our data we propose that differences in the protrusion persistence of leaders and followers originate in the distinct actomyosin contraction modules that differentially regulate leading edge protrusion-promoting F-actin assembly, and retraction-promoting retrograde flow.

Indexed as

Cell MovementActin CytoskeletonActinsActomyosinAnimalsCells, CulturedCytoskeletonEpitheliumKineticsMicroscopy, FluorescencePseudopodiaActinsActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID20406634
PMCPMC2900543
OpenAlexW2021780327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.