Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20406502›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Multivariate classification of urine metabolome profiles for breast cancer diagnosis.

Younghoon Kim, Imhoi Koo, Byung Hwa Jung, Bong Chul Chung, Doheon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Identification of a Novel Biomarker Panel for Breast Cancer Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Untargeted UrinaryMetabolites · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analytical methods in untargeted metabolomics: state of the art in 2015.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
  18. Review of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in cancer research.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Younghoon KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea.
Imhoi Koo
Byung Hwa Jung
Bong Chul Chung
Doheon Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis techniques using urine are non-invasive, inexpensive, and easy to perform in clinical settings. The metabolites in urine, as the end products of cellular processes, are closely linked to phenotypes. Therefore, urine metabolome is very useful in marker discoveries and clinical applications. However, only univariate methods have been used in classification studies using urine metabolome. Since multiple genes or proteins would be involved in developments of complex diseases such as breast cancer, multiple compounds including metabolites would be related with the complex diseases, and multivariate methods would be needed to identify those multiple metabolite markers. Moreover, because combinatorial effects among the markers can seriously affect disease developments and there also exist individual differences in genetic makeup or heterogeneity in cancer progressions, single marker is not enough to identify cancers.

resultsWe proposed classification models using multivariate classification techniques and developed an analysis procedure for classification studies using metabolome data. Through this strategy, we identified five potential urinary biomarkers for breast cancer with high accuracy, among which the four biomarker candidates were not identifiable by only univariate methods. We also proposed potential diagnosis rules to help in clinical decision making. Besides, we showed that combinatorial effects among multiple biomarkers can enhance discriminative power for breast cancer.

conclusionsIn this study, we successfully showed that multivariate classifications are needed to precisely diagnose breast cancer. After further validation with independent cohorts and experimental confirmation, these marker candidates will likely lead to clinically applicable assays for earlier diagnoses of breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDecision TreesFemaleHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20406502
PMCPMC3165203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.