ArticleBMC systems biology2010
Identification of responsive gene modules by network-based gene clustering and extending: application to inflammation and angiogenesis.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification of interconnected markers for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.BioMed research international · 2013Pooled it
- Open MoA: revealing the mechanism of action (MoA) based on network topology and hierarchy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- SEMtree: tree-based structure learning methods with structural equation models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Temporal and sequential order of nonoverlapping gene networks unraveled in mated female Drosophila.Life science alliance · 2022Article
- Drug repositioning by merging active subnetworks validated in cancer and COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An efficient and effective method to identify significantly perturbed subnetworks in cancer.Nature computational science · 2021Article
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Differentially mutated subnetworks discovery.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2019Article
- A Comprehensive Survey of Tools and Software for Active Subnetwork Identification.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Computational systems biology approaches for Parkinson's disease.Cell and tissue research · 2018Review
- A Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Molecular Mechanisms of Herbal Formula Ban-Xia-Xie-Xin-Tang.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018Article
- Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- HTS-Net: An integrated regulome-interactome approach for establishing network regulation models in high-throughput screenings.PloS one · 2017Article
- On the performance of de novo pathway enrichment.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2017Article
- Quantitative Identification of Compound-Dependent On-Modules and Differential Allosteric Modules From Homologous Ischemic Networks.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016Article
- Article
- Spatiotemporal positioning of multipotent modules in diverse biological networks.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Review
- Causal inference of gene regulation with subnetwork assembly from genetical genomics data.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Assessment of subnetwork detection methods for breast cancer.Cancer informatics · 2014Article
- Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCell responses to environmental stimuli are usually organized as relatively separate responsive gene modules at the molecular level. Identification of responsive gene modules rather than individual differentially expressed (DE) genes will provide important information about the underlying molecular mechanisms. Most of current methods formulate module identification as an optimization problem: find the active sub-networks in the genome-wide gene network by maximizing the objective function considering the gene differential expression and/or the gene-gene co-expression information. Here we presented a new formulation of this task: a group of closely-connected and co-expressed DE genes in the gene network are regarded as the signatures of the underlying responsive gene modules; the modules can be identified by finding the signatures and then recovering the "missing parts" by adding the intermediate genes that connect the DE genes in the gene network.
resultsClustEx, a two-step method based on the new formulation, was developed and applied to identify the responsive gene modules of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in inflammation and angiogenesis models by integrating the time-course microarray data and genome-wide PPI data. It shows better performance than several available module identification tools by testing on the reference responsive gene sets. Gene set analysis of KEGG pathways, GO terms and microRNAs (miRNAs) target gene sets further supports the ClustEx predictions.
conclusionTaking the closely-connected and co-expressed DE genes in the condition-specific gene network as the signatures of the underlying responsive gene modules provides a new strategy to solve the module identification problem. The identified responsive gene modules of HUVECs and the corresponding enriched pathways/miRNAs provide useful resources for understanding the inflammatory and angiogenic responses of vascular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.