Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20405211›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2010

The case for endoscopic treatment of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

David E Fleischer, Robert Odze, Bergein F Overholt, John Carroll, Kenneth J Chang, Ananya Das, John Goldblum, Daniel Miller, Charles J Lightdale, Jeffrey Peters and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02793479 (National Registry for Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02793479 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

National Registry for Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMatthias PairederRan2017 to 2021Enrolled500ConditionsBarrett's Esophagus, Radiofrequency Ablation, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Durability of Endoscopic Therapy for Treatment of Barrett's Metaplasia, Dysplasia, and Mucosal Cancer After Nissen Fundoplication.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Preference of endoscopic ablation over medical prevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma by patients with Barrett's esophagus.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015
    Article
  8. Review on novel concepts of columnar lined esophagus.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis and management of Barrett's metaplasia: What's new.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Barrett's Esophagus without dysplasia: wait or ablate?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2011
    Article
  15. Ablative therapies for Barrett's esophagus.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011
    Review
  16. Barrett's esophagus: a review of the literature.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2011
    Review
  17. "War and Peace" with Barrett's esophagus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2011
    Article
  18. Barrett's esophagus: Clinical issues.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2011
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

David E FleischerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA. fleischer.david@mayo.edu
Robert Odze
Bergein F Overholt
John Carroll
Kenneth J Chang
Ananya Das
John Goldblum
Daniel Miller
Charles J Lightdale
Jeffrey Peters
Richard Rothstein
Virender K Sharma
Daniel Smith
Victor Velanovich
Herbert Wolfsen
George Triadafilopoulos
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · USHematology Oncology Associates · USHenry Ford Hospital · USJacksonville College · USMayo Clinic · USPresbyterian Hospital · USStanford University · USTroy Gastroenterology · USUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-dysplastic mucosa (ND-) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) shows clonal molecular aberrations, loss of cell cycle control, and other features of "neoplasia." These changes occur prior to morphologic expression of neoplasia (dysplasia). Morphologic evaluation of dysplasia is fraught with error, and, as a result, often leads to false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Early "crypt dysplasia" is difficult to detect, and is often missed in routine biopsy specimens. Some studies show substantial progression rates of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and crypt dysplasia, to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Dysplasia, even when fully developed, may, in certain circumstances, be difficult to differentiate from non-dysplastic (regenerating) BE. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for removing mucosa at risk of cancer. Given the difficulties of dysplasia assessment in mucosal biopsies, and the molecular characteristics of ND-BE, this technique should be considered for treatment of all BE patients, including those with ND or LGD. Post-ablation neo-squamous epithelium reveals no molecular abnormalities, and is biologically stable. Given that prospective randomized controlled trials of ablative therapy for ND-BE aiming at reducing EAC incidence and mortality are unlikely to be completed in the near future, endoscopic ablation is a valid management option. The success of RFA in achieving safe, uniform, reliable, and predictable elimination of BE allows surgeons to combine fundoplication with RFA. Currently, there is no type of treatment for dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE that achieves a complete response in 100% of patients, eliminates all risk of developing cancer, results in zero adverse events, is less expensive in terms of absolute costs than surveillance, is durable for 20+ years, or eliminates the need for surveillance. Regardless, RFA shows established safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effective profiles that should be considered in the management of patients with non-dysplastic or low-grade dysplastic BE.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusBiopsy, NeedleCatheter AblationEndoscopyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMalePrecancerous ConditionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20405211
OpenAlexW2141440403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.