ArticlePloS one2010
Development of hepatitis C virus genotyping by real-time PCR based on the NS5B region.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fast and cost-effective method for identifying a polymorphism of interleukin 28B related to hepatitis C.PloS one · 2013Trial
- HCV Detection, Discrimination, and Genotyping Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus in 952 cases from 2014 to 2016 in Hunan Province, China.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2018Article
- Analysis of Transmission Routes of Hepatitis C Virus Based on Virus Genotyping in 341 Cases with Different Suspected Initial Infection Time Points in Hunan Province, China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- A Single-step Multiplex Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2017Article
- Determining hepatitis C virus genotype distribution among high-risk groups in Iran using real-time PCR.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative performance evaluation of hepatitis C virus genotyping based on the 5' untranslated region versus partial sequencing of the NS5B region of brazilian patients with chronic hepatitis C.Virology journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCarilho, Flair J [corrected to Carrilho, Flair J]
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is the most significant predictor of the response to antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel real-time PCR method for HCV genotyping based on the NS5B region. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsTwo triplex reaction sets were designed, one to detect genotypes 1a, 1b and 3a; and another to detect genotypes 2a, 2b, and 2c. This approach had an overall sensitivity of 97.0%, detecting 295 of the 304 tested samples. All samples genotyped by real-time PCR had the same type that was assigned using LiPA version 1 (Line in Probe Assay). Although LiPA v. 1 was not able to subtype 68 of the 295 samples (23.0%) and rendered different subtype results from those assigned by real-time PCR for 12/295 samples (4.0%), NS5B sequencing and real-time PCR results agreed in all 146 tested cases. Analytical sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay was determined by end-point dilution of the 5000 IU/ml member of the OptiQuant HCV RNA panel. The lower limit of detection was estimated to be 125 IU/ml for genotype 3a, 250 IU/ml for genotypes 1b and 2b, and 500 IU/ml for genotype 1a. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The total time required for performing this assay was two hours, compared to four hours required for LiPA v. 1 after PCR-amplification. Furthermore, the estimated reaction cost was nine times lower than that of available commercial methods in Brazil. Thus, we have developed an efficient, feasible, and affordable method for HCV genotype identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.