Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20404482›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2010

DNA damage response induced by exposure of human lung adenocarcinoma cells to smoke from tobacco- and nicotine-free cigarettes.

Ellen D Jorgensen, Hong Zhao, Frank Traganos, Anthony P Albino, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessing tobacco use by cancer patients and facilitating cessation: an American Association for Cancer Research policy statement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  13. Nicotine and lung cancer.Journal of carcinogenesis · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New biomarkers probing depth of cell senescence assessed by laser scanning cytometry.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2010
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen D JorgensenBrander Cancer Research Institute and Department of Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Hong Zhao
Frank Traganos
Anthony P Albino
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
New York Medical College · USRussian State Agrarian Correspondence University · RU

Funding

PROBES FOR FLOW CYTOMETRYR01CA028704 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI DARZYNKIEWICZ, ZBIGNIEW · 1985 to 2014
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA028704PHS HHS R01 28 704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cigarette smoke (CS) is the major cause of lung cancer and contributes to the development of other malignancies. Attempts have been made to construct reduced toxicity cigarettes, presumed to have diminished genotoxic potential. One such product on the market is the tobacco and nicotine free (T&N-free) cigarette type made from lettuce and herbal extracts. We have recently developed a sensitive assay of the genotoxicity of CS based on cytometric analysis of induction of the DNA damage response (DDR) in normal human pulmonary endothelial or A549 pulmonary adenocarcinoma cells. In the present study, we observed that exposure of A549 cells to CS from T/N-free cigarettes induced a smoke-dose dependent DDR as evidenced by phosphorylation (activation) of the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein kinase and of the histone H2AX (γH2AX). The extent of DDR induced by T&N-free smoke was distinctly greater than that induced by comparable doses of CS from reference cigarettes (2R4F) containing tobacco and nicotine. The pattern of DDR induced by T&N-free smoke was similar to that of 2R4F cigarettes in terms of the cell cycle phase specificity and involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The data also imply that similar to 2R4F exposure of cells to T/N-free smoke leads to formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) resulting from collapse of replication forks upon collision with the primary ssDNA lesions induced by smoke. Since DSBs are potentially carcinogenic our data indicate that smoking tobacco and nicotine-free cigarettes is at least as hazardous as smoking cigarettes containing tobacco and nicotine.

Indexed as

DNA RepairSmokeAdenocarcinomaAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedG1 PhaseHistonesHumansLung NeoplasmsMutagenicity TestsNicotianaNicotinePhosphorylationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesNicotineProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSmokeTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20404482
PMCPMC3032023
OpenAlexW2095812928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.