Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20403481›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of cardiology2010

Relation of different measures of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to risk of coronary artery disease and death in a meta-regression analysis of large-scale trials of statin therapy.

Jorge R Kizer, Christopher Madias, Brian Wilner, Carl J Vaughan, Alvin I Mushlin, Paula Trushin, Antonio M Gotto, Richard C Pasternak

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease in women.Current cardiology reports · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge R KizerDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. jok2007@med.cornell.edu
Christopher Madias
Brian Wilner
Carl J Vaughan
Alvin I Mushlin
Paula Trushin
Antonio M Gotto
Richard C Pasternak
Cornell University · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMercy University Hospital · IETufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Thrombophilia In Cryptogenic Stroke (THICK) StudyK23HL070854 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KIZER, JORGE R · 2002 to 2006
$653k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL070854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have established the efficacy of statins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. The benefits observed are often framed in terms of percentage reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline or percentage reductions between control and treatment groups, although epidemiologic data suggest that the absolute intergroup difference in LDL cholesterol (DeltaLDL(Control-Rx)) is the more informative measure. A systematic review of large-scale trials of statins versus placebo, usual care, or active (lower dose statin) control was conducted to calculate updated summary estimates of risk reduction in coronary artery disease and all-cause mortality. Meta-regression analysis was used to ascertain the relations of different LDL cholesterol metrics to outcomes. In 20 eligible RCTs, there were significant overall reductions for coronary artery disease (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.78) and mortality (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.94), but with substantial variability in trial results. DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) was the strongest determinant of coronary artery disease risk reduction, particularly after excluding active-comparator studies, and was independent of baseline LDL cholesterol. In contrast, baseline LDL cholesterol edged out DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) as the strongest determinant of mortality, but neither was significant after the exclusion of active-comparator studies. The exclusion of 3 RCTs involving distinct populations, however, rendered DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) the predominant determinant of mortality reduction. In conclusion, these findings underscore the primacy of absolute reductions in LDL cholesterol in the design and interpretation of RCTs of lipid-lowering therapies and in framing treatment recommendations on the basis of the proved coronary benefits of these drugs.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCholesterol, LDLDeath, Sudden, CardiacHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsUnited StatesCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20403481
PMCPMC2917836
OpenAlexW1987109158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.