Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20403199›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2010

High-throughput analysis of candidate imprinted genes and allele-specific gene expression in the human term placenta.

Caroline Daelemans, Matthew E Ritchie, Guillaume Smits, Sayeda Abu-Amero, Ian M Sudbery, Matthew S Forrest, Susana Campino, Taane G Clark, Philip Stanier, Dominic Kwiatkowski and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parental bias in expression and interaction of genes in the equine placenta.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Caroline DaelemansWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1 SA, UK.
Matthew E Ritchie
Guillaume Smits
Sayeda Abu-Amero
Ian M Sudbery
Matthew S Forrest
Susana Campino
Taane G Clark
Philip Stanier
Dominic Kwiatkowski
Panos Deloukas
Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
Simon Tavaré
Gudrun E Moore
Ian Dunham
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600230Medical Research Council G19/9Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprinted genes show expression from one parental allele only and are important for development and behaviour. This extreme mode of allelic imbalance has been described for approximately 56 human genes. Imprinting status is often disrupted in cancer and dysmorphic syndromes. More subtle variation of gene expression, that is not parent-of-origin specific, termed 'allele-specific gene expression' (ASE) is more common and may give rise to milder phenotypic differences. Using two allele-specific high-throughput technologies alongside bioinformatics predictions, normal term human placenta was screened to find new imprinted genes and to ascertain the extent of ASE in this tissue.

resultsTwenty-three family trios of placental cDNA, placental genomic DNA (gDNA) and gDNA from both parents were tested for 130 candidate genes with the Sequenom MassArray system. Six genes were found differentially expressed but none imprinted. The Illumina ASE BeadArray platform was then used to test 1536 SNPs in 932 genes. The array was enriched for the human orthologues of 124 mouse candidate genes from bioinformatics predictions and 10 human candidate imprinted genes from EST database mining. After quality control pruning, a total of 261 informative SNPs (214 genes) remained for analysis. Imprinting with maternal expression was demonstrated for the lymphocyte imprinted gene ZNF331 in human placenta. Two potential differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were found in the vicinity of ZNF331. None of the bioinformatically predicted candidates tested showed imprinting except for a skewed allelic expression in a parent-specific manner observed for PHACTR2, a neighbour of the imprinted PLAGL1 gene. ASE was detected for two or more individuals in 39 candidate genes (18%).

conclusionsBoth Sequenom and Illumina assays were sensitive enough to study imprinting and strong allelic bias. Previous bioinformatics approaches were not predictive of new imprinted genes in the human term placenta. ZNF331 is imprinted in human term placenta and might be a new ubiquitously imprinted gene, part of a primate-specific locus. Demonstration of partial imprinting of PHACTR2 calls for re-evaluation of the allelic pattern of expression for the PHACTR2-PLAGL1 locus. ASE was common in human term placenta.

Indexed as

AllelesComputational BiologyGenomic ImprintingDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMicrofilament ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlacentaPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancySensitivity and SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPHACTR2 protein, humanZNF331 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID20403199
PMCPMC2871261
OpenAlexW2141204849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.