Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20402990›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2010

A brief alcohol intervention for hazardously drinking incarcerated women.

Michael D Stein, Celeste M Caviness, Bradley J Anderson, Meg Hebert, Jennifer G Clarke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Hazardously Drinking Jailed Women: Post-Release Perceived Needs and Risk of Reincarceration.International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · 2017
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Hazardously drinking women leaving jail: time to first drink.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2011
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceived Substance Use Norms Among Jailed Women with Alcohol Use Disorders.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael D SteinButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA. michael_stein@brown.edu
Celeste M Caviness
Bradley J Anderson
Meg Hebert
Jennifer G Clarke

Funding

A BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION FOR INCARCERATED WOMENR01AA014495 · NIAAA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI STEIN, MICHAEL D · 2003 to 2007
$2.4M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCHK24DA000512 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI STEIN, MICHAEL D · 2001 to 2010
$982k
DISCOVERY OF NOVEL MOLECULAR TARGETS FOR ENDOGENOUS AND SYNTHETIC CANNABINOIDSZ01DA000512 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHIPPENBERG, TONI · 2007 to 2008
$189k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000512NIAAA NIH HHS AA 014495NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014495NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that among hazardously drinking incarcerated women who are returning to the community, a brief alcohol intervention will result in less alcohol use at follow-up relative to standard of care.

methodsEligible participants endorsed hazardous alcohol consumption-four or more drinks at a time on at least 3 separate days in the previous 3 months or a score of 8 or above on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Participants were randomized to either an assessment-only condition or to two brief motivationally focused sessions, the first delivered during incarceration, the second 1 month later after community re-entry. Participants recalled drinking behaviors at 3 and 6 months after the baseline interview using a 90-day time-line follow-back method.

resultsThe 245 female participants averaged 34 years of age, and were 71% Caucasian. The mean percentage of alcohol use days in the 3 months prior to incarceration was 51.7% and heavy alcohol use days was 43.9%. Intervention effects on abstinent days were statistically significant at 3 months (odds ratio = 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.17, 3.30); the percentage of days abstinent was 68% for those randomized to intervention and 57% for controls. At 6 months the effect of the intervention was attenuated and no longer statistically significant.

conclusionsAmong incarcerated women who reported hazardous drinking, a two-session brief alcohol intervention increased abstinent days at 3 months, but this effect decayed by 6 months. Study participants continued to drink heavily after return to the community. More intensive intervention pre-release and after re-entry may benefit hazardously drinking incarcerated women.

Indexed as

CounselingMotivationPsychotherapy, BriefAdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrisonersYoung AdultAlcoholIncarcerationWomen

Identifiers

PMID20402990
PMCPMC2858363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.