Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20402985›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2010

Genetic and environmental influences on cannabis use initiation and problematic use: a meta-analysis of twin studies.

Karin J H Verweij, Brendan P Zietsch, Michael T Lynskey, Sarah E Medland, Michael C Neale, Nicholas G Martin, Dorret I Boomsma, Jacqueline M Vink

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Genetic and environmental influences on neuroimaging phenotypes: a meta-analytical perspective on twin imaging studies.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karin J H VerweijGenetic Epidemiology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Brendan P Zietsch
Michael T Lynskey
Sarah E Medland
Michael C Neale
Nicholas G Martin
Dorret I Boomsma
Jacqueline M Vink

Funding

Cannabis and Other Illicit Drug Use: A Twin StudyR01DA018267 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LYNSKEY, MICHAEL THOMAS · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS DA018267NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause cannabis use is associated with social, physical and psychological problems, it is important to know what causes some individuals to initiate cannabis use and a subset of those to become problematic users. Previous twin studies found evidence for both genetic and environmental influences on vulnerability, but due to considerable variation in the results it is difficult to draw clear conclusions regarding the relative magnitude of these influences.

methodsA systematic literature search identified 28 twin studies on cannabis use initiation and 24 studies on problematic cannabis use. The proportion of total variance accounted for by genes (A), shared environment (C) and unshared environment (E) in (i) initiation of cannabis use and (ii) problematic cannabis use was calculated by averaging corresponding A, C and E estimates across studies from independent cohorts and weighting by sample size.

resultsFor cannabis use initiation, A, C and E estimates were 48%, 25% and 27% in males and 40%, 39% and 21% in females. For problematic cannabis use A, C and E estimates were 51%, 20% and 29% for males and 59%, 15% and 26% for females. Confidence intervals of these estimates are considerably narrower than those in the source studies.

conclusionsOur results indicate that vulnerability to both cannabis use initiation and problematic use was influenced significantly by A, C and E. There was a trend for a greater C and lesser A component for cannabis use initiation compared to problematic use for females.

Indexed as

Social EnvironmentAdolescentAdultChildDiseases in TwinsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPhenotypeRisk FactorsSex FactorsTwin Studies as TopicYoung Adultcannabisgeneticsheritabilitymeta-analysistwin research

Identifiers

PMID20402985
PMCPMC2858354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.