Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2040255›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1991

Physiology of bone: mineral compartment proteins as candidates for environmental perturbation by lead.

J J Sauk, M J Somerman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exposure to heavy metals and the risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J J SaukDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore 21201.
M J Somerman
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

REGENERATION OF THE PERIODONTIUM: AN IN VITRO STUDYR01DE007512 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SOMERMAN, MARTHA J · 1986 to 1988
–
NIDCR NIH HHS DE07512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Termine et al. first demonstrated that sequential dissociative extraction and fractionation procedures with protease inhibitors could provide a convenient approach for the study of mineral compartment constituents. The primary extraction regimen used 4 M guanidine HCl to remove most of the protein from the nonmineralized phase of bone. Subsequently, EDTA-guanidine was used to remove the mineral-phase components. These methods discriminate on the basis of physical-chemical association with a mineral phase rather than on the specific gene products of a particular cell. In the present discussion emphasis is directed at a group of divalent cation binding proteins isolated from the mineral compartment of bone. The localization, synthesis, and chemical characteristics of osteonectin, bone sialoproteins I and II, and bone acidic glycoprotein-75 are discussed and offered as possible sites for perturbation by the environment with lead exposure.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBone MatrixEnvironmental PollutantsHomeostasisHumansLead PoisoningMineralsMolecular Sequence DataOsteonectinProteinsEnvironmental PollutantsMineralsOsteonectinProteins

Identifiers

PMID2040255
PMCPMC1519352
OpenAlexW1981384100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.