ArticlePharmacoEconomics2010
Direct and indirect costs of non-vertebral fracture patients with osteoporosis in the US.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the indirect and social costs studies in fragility fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020Pooled it
- Association between age at menopause and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endocrine · 2019Pooled it
- Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014Pooled it
- Osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review of U.S. healthcare costs and resource utilization.PharmacoEconomics · 2012Pooled it
- Teriparatide and pelvic fracture healing: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022Trial
- Duration of anticholinergic burden and polypharmacy and the risk of fractures in older Korean adults: a nationwide cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Epidemiology and disease burden of fractures in Asia, 1990-2021: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Short-term air pollution and fracture admissions in Beijing.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analysis and optimization of inpatient cost structure for fracture patients under the implementation of the DRG policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Morphological, molecular, and pharmacological review of veldt grape (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of fracture of sternum and/or fracture of one or more ribs: a systematic analysis of incidence, YLDs with projections to 2030.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Fracture incidence in women: the impact of reproductive characteristics.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Analysis of the relationship between shorter sleep duration and wrist fractures: based on NHANES.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness.JBMR plus · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection with different image modalities and data types: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Costs of incident non-hip osteoporosis-related fractures in postmenopausal women from a payer perspective.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Article
- Association Between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and the Risk of Fracture in Chinese Adults: Longitudinal Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a condition marked by low bone mineral density and the deterioration of bone tissue. One of the main clinical and economic consequences of osteoporosis is skeletal fractures. To assess the healthcare and work loss costs of US patients with non-vertebral (NV) osteoporotic fractures. Privately insured (aged 18-64 years) and Medicare (aged >/=65 years) patients with osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM code: 733.0x) were identified during 1999-2006 using two claims databases. Patients with an NV fracture (femur, pelvis, lower leg, upper arm, forearm, rib or hip) were matched randomly on age, sex, employment status and geographic region to controls with osteoporosis and no fractures. Patient characteristics and annual healthcare costs were assessed over the year following the index fracture for privately insured (n = 4764) and Medicare (n = 48 742) beneficiaries (Medicare drug costs were estimated using multivariable models). Indirect (i.e. work loss) costs were calculated for a subset of privately insured, employed patients with available disability data (n = 1148). All costs were reported in $US, year 2006 values. In Medicare, mean incremental healthcare costs per NV fracture patient were $US13 387 ($US22 466 vs $US9079; p < 0.05). The most expensive patients had index fractures of the hip, multiple sites and femur (incremental costs of $US25 519, $US20 137 and $US19 403, respectively). Patients with NV non-hip (NVNH) fractures had incremental healthcare costs of $US7868 per patient ($US16 704 vs $US8836; p < 0.05). Aggregate annual incremental healthcare costs of NVNH patients in the Medicare research sample (n = 35 933) were $US282.7 million compared with $US204.1 million for hip fracture patients (n = 7997). Among the privately insured, mean incremental healthcare costs per NV fracture patient were $US5961 ($US11 636 vs $US5675; p < 0.05). The most expensive patients had index fractures of the hip, multiple sites and pelvis (incremental costs of $US13 801, $US9642 and $US8164, respectively). Annual incremental healthcare costs per NVNH patient were $US5381 ($US11 090 vs $US5709; p < 0.05). Aggregate annual incremental healthcare costs of NVNH patients in the privately insured sample (n = 4478) were $US24.1 million compared with $US3.5 million for hip fracture patients (n = 255). Mean incremental work loss costs per NV fracture employee were $US1956 ($US4349 vs $US2393; p < 0.05). Among patients with available disability data, work loss accounted for 29.5% of total costs per NV fracture employee. The cost burden of NV fracture patients to payers is substantial. Although hip fracture patients were more costly per patient in both Medicare and privately insured samples, NVNH fracture patients still had substantial incremental costs. Because NVNH patients accounted for a larger proportion of the fracture population, they were associated with greater aggregate incremental healthcare costs than hip fracture patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.