ArticleJournal of bioinformatics and computational biology2010
Detecting copy number variations from array CGH data based on a conditional random field model.
Article in Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A custom ddPCR method for the detection of copy number variations in the nebulin triplicate region.PloS one · 2022Article
- Fuzzy methods for the detection of copy number variations in comparative genomic hybridization arrays.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
- Estimating absolute methylation levels at single-CpG resolution from methylation enrichment and restriction enzyme sequencing methods.Genome research · 2013Article
- Interpreting genomic data via entropic dissection.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- THE SCREENING AND RANKING ALGORITHM TO DETECT DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS.The annals of applied statistics · 2012Article
- CopyMap: localization and calling of copy number variation by joint analysis of hybridization data from multiple individuals.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) allows identification of copy number alterations across genomes. The key computational challenge in analyzing copy number variations (CNVs) using aCGH data or other similar data generated by a variety of array technologies is the detection of segment boundaries of copy number changes and inference of the copy number state for each segment. We have developed a novel statistical model based on the framework of conditional random fields (CRFs) that can effectively combine data smoothing, segmentation and copy number state decoding into one unified framework. Our approach (termed CRF-CNV) provides great flexibilities in defining meaningful feature functions. Therefore, it can effectively integrate local spatial information of arbitrary sizes into the model. For model parameter estimations, we have adopted the conjugate gradient (CG) method for likelihood optimization and developed efficient forward/backward algorithms within the CG framework. The method is evaluated using real data with known copy numbers as well as simulated data with realistic assumptions, and compared with two popular publicly available programs. Experimental results have demonstrated that CRF-CNV outperforms a Bayesian Hidden Markov Model-based approach on both datasets in terms of copy number assignments. Comparing to a non-parametric approach, CRF-CNV has achieved much greater precision while maintaining the same level of recall on the real data, and their performance on the simulated data is comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.