Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20401605›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2010

Alteration of intravenous nicotine self-administration by opioid receptor agonist and antagonists in rats.

Naila Ismayilova, Mohammed Shoaib

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Translational Research in Nicotine Addiction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Rise and Fall of Kappa-Opioid Receptors in Drug Abuse Research.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  8. Nicotine Gateway Effects on Adolescent Substance Use.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The opioid receptors as targets for drug abuse medication.British journal of pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prenatal exposure to nicotine stimulates neurogenesis of orexigenic peptide-expressing neurons in hypothalamus and amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  17. Development of novel pharmacotherapeutics for tobacco dependence: progress and future directions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Influence of δ-opioid receptors in the behavioral effects of nicotine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2012
    Article
  20. Stress-induced activation of the dynorphin/κ-opioid receptor system in the amygdala potentiates nicotine conditioned place preference.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naila IsmayilovaPsychobiology Research Laboratories, Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Mohammed Shoaib
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe role played by endogenous opioids in mediating the reinforcing properties of nicotine is unclear. As with preclinical studies, clinical trials with naloxone, a prototypic opioid receptor antagonist have yielded equivocal findings with regard to its efficacy in reducing cigarette smoking.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the effects of three opioids that exhibit relative selectivity at mu-, kappa- and delta-opioid receptors on nicotine self-administration in male hooded Lister rats.

methodsGraded doses (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg IP) of each opioid agonist or antagonist were tested in different groups of rats repeatedly over three consecutive nicotine intravenous nicotine-self administration (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) sessions. The same treatments were tested in parallel groups of rats trained to respond for food reinforcement.

resultsNaloxone was very effective in attenuating the levels of nicotine self-administered across all doses tested. The selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist U50,488, reduced nicotine self-administration in doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg, while the 0.3 mg/kg dose produced a small increase in nicotine intake. Finally, the specific delta-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrindole did not significantly modify nicotine self-administration behaviour. In contrast, all three opioids failed to modify behaviour maintained by food reinforcement.

conclusionsThese findings suggest endogenous opioids are crucial in mediating the reinforcing effects of nicotine and that the mu-opioid receptor subtype may represent a potential target for selectively reducing nicotine-taking behaviour as part of a pharmacological approach to develop smoking cessation aids.

Indexed as

Narcotic Antagonists3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-IsomerAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeeding BehaviorMaleNaloxoneNaltrexoneNicotineRatsReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, muSelf AdministrationTobacco Use Disorder3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-IsomerNaloxoneNaltrexonenaltrindoleNarcotic AntagonistsNicotineReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID20401605
OpenAlexW2038069426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.