ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2011
Assessment of palliative care cancer patients' most important concerns.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes.Palliative medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Combined exercise and nutritional rehabilitation in outpatients with incurable cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- A prospective, randomized trial of patient-reported outcome measures to drive management decisions in hematology and oncology.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Care plus study: a multi-site implementation of early palliative care in routine practice to improve health outcomes and reduce hospital admissions for people with advanced cancer: a study protocol.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Self-efficacy for coping: utility of the Cancer behavior inventory (Italian) for use in palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2019Article
- Challenges in supporting lay carers of patients at the end of life: results from focus group discussions with primary healthcare providers.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Lack of Patient-Clinician Concordance in Cancer Patients: Its Relation With Patient Variables.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2017Article
- Evaluating a new methodology for providing individualized feedback in healthcare on quality of life and its importance, using the WHOQOL-BREF in a community population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Validation of the electronic Holistic Needs Assessment.SpringerPlus · 2015Article
- Emotional distress and compassionate responses in palliative care decision-making consultations.Journal of palliative medicine · 2014Article
- Quality of life in patients with muscle invasive and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Article
- Palliative care needs of patients with cancer living in the community.Journal of oncology practice · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPatients in the palliative care setting have a number of concerns not necessarily connected to their medical problems, such as spiritual and relationship issues. When these problems are not properly assessed and addressed, they may become a significant source of distress for patients and families. The aims of the present study were to assess the concerns of patients attending a palliative care clinic, to examine physicians' ratings of patient concerns, to access the concordance between patients' and physicians' ratings, and to assess the association between patients' concerns and their level of distress.
methodsWe evaluated 137 patients attending a symptom control and palliative care clinic. Patients completed the Concerns Checklist, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Cancer Behavior Inventory at the beginning of their visit. The Concerns Checklist was completed by the patient's clinic physician immediately after the visit and was used to estimate how accurate the physician was in identifying patients' concerns. We examined the correlation between the total number of patient concerns and their levels of anxiety, mood disturbance, and self-efficacy.
resultsPatients were most concerned about loss of function, the future, and caring for themselves. Concordance between physician and patient rating of concerns was poor (all kappas, 0.26 or lower). Higher levels of patient concerns were associated with greater anxiety (r = 0.52) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.40) and lower self-efficacy (r = -0.37).
conclusionsThere was generally poor concordance between patients reporting of their concerns and physicians reporting of the patients' concerns. In addition, patients' with more concerns also had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to find strategies to more accurately identify patients' concerns, so that they can be adequately addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20401497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.