ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2010
Door-to-balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts degree of myocardial necrosis as measured using cardiac biomarkers.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- When relativity has no relevance.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduced door-to-balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction has been associated with lower cardiac mortality rates. However, it remains unclear whether door-to-balloon time is predominantly a surrogate for overall peri-myocardial infarction care and is not independently predictive of outcomes, particularly when differences in door-to-balloon time have narrowed and previous studies have contained myocardial infarction-selection bias.We analyzed 179 consecutive patients who presented emergently at our cardiac catheterization laboratory with ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours of symptom onset and who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 3 hours of presentation. Our curve estimation regression model used the natural logarithm (ln) of area under the curve (AUC) of creatine kinase to evaluate the effect of door-to-balloon time on cardiac biomarker levels. We correlated ln (AUC-creatine kinase) with improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up and with the intermediate-term mortality rate.Median door-to-balloon time was 87 minutes (interquartile range, 65-113 min). The ln (AUC-creatine kinase) correlated significantly with door-to-balloon time (r=0.2, P=0.02). Upon propensity-score analysis, door-to-balloon time remained a significant independent predictor of ln (AUC-creatine kinase) (beta=0.15, P=0.03). Upon use of a Cox regression model, ln (AUC-creatine kinase) independently predicted death (P=0.04) and recovery of left ventricular function (P=0.001) at follow-up (mean, 14 mo).Longer door-to-balloon time independently predicts increased myocardial cell damage, and ln (AUC-creatine kinase) predicts improvement in left ventricular systolic function and intermediate-term death after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20401287PMC2851434W188663788What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.