ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011
The care of critically ill children after hematopoietic SCT: a North American survey.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Organizational characteristics of European pediatric onco-critical care: An international cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- A Critical Care and Transplantation-Based Approach to Acute Respiratory Failure after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016Review
- New Insights Into Multicenter PICU Mortality Among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.Critical care medicine · 2015Article
- Outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation after pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic SCT: results from a prospective, multicenter registry.Bone marrow transplantation · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although potentially curative, hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) is associated with significant morbidity. To improve outcomes, multicenter studies of critical illness in this patient population appear needed. To assist in the design of such studies, a survey was conducted to identify variations in care provided to critically ill pediatric HSCT patients. A survey was conducted of the highest volume pediatric HSCT centers in the United States (n=30) and Canada (n=4). One pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) physician and one pediatric HSCT physician were surveyed at each institution. Analysis consisted of descriptive statistics. Thirty-three (29 United States/4 Canada) of 34 institutions responded. Although most HSCT units permit fluid boluses and nearly half permit some dose of dopamine, high-dose dopamine and other vasoactive infusions are rarely allowed there. Six institutions (21%) permit non-invasive ventilation on the HSCT unit. Criterion for PCCM consultation and therapies implemented before intubation vary significantly. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and renal replacement therapy are commonly used for lung injury in patients failing conventional therapy. Variability exists in the location and type of therapy critically ill pediatric HSCT patients receive. Understanding this variability will help facilitate the design of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.