Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20399212›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2010

The effects of progesterone pretreatment on the response to oral d-amphetamine in Women.

Stephanie C Reed, Frances R Levin, Suzette M Evans

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Behavioral effects of endogenous or exogenous estradiol and progesterone on cocaine sensitization in female rats.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Alcohol increases impulsivity and abuse liability in heavy drinking women.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie C ReedDivision on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. sc2432@columbia.edu
Frances R Levin
Suzette M Evans
Columbia University · US

Funding

VULNERABILITY TO ANXIOLYTIC ABUSE IN WOMENR01DA009114 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI EVANS, SUZETTE M · 1995 to 2010
$4.6M
Sex Differences & Impulsivity: Effect of Drug History & Stimulant AdministrationK01DA022282 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REED, STEPHANIE C · 2007 to 2011
$856k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA022282NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009114PHS HHS K01 022282PHS HHS K02 000465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulant abuse continues to be a problem, particularly for women. There is increasing preclinical and clinical evidence showing that the hormone progesterone attenuates the behavioral effects of cocaine, and this effect is primarily observed in females. The purpose of the present study was to determine if progesterone would also alter the behavioral effects of another stimulant, oral d-amphetamine (AMPH) in women. Eighteen normal non-drug abusing women completed eight outpatient sessions over two menstrual cycles. During the follicular phase of each cycle, women were administered AMPH (0, 10, 20 mg); in one cycle they were pretreated with oral micronized progesterone (200 mg) and in another cycle they were pretreated with placebo progesterone. Each session, participants completed a range of tasks including subjective measures of abuse liability, cognitive performance tasks, and behavioral measures of impulsivity and risk-taking. AMPH produced dose-related increases in positive subjective effects and these effects were enhanced by progesterone pretreatment. AMPH alone, or in combination with progesterone, had little effect on performance or behavioral measures of impulsivity. These results are in contrast with previous studies showing that progesterone attenuates the subjective response to cocaine and nicotine. Additional studies are needed to explore the modulatory role of progesterone on the effects of AMPH to determine whether progesterone has any clinical utility for AMPH abuse.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCognitionDextroamphetamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMenstrual CyclePlacebosProgesteroneRisk-TakingCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetaminePlacebosProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID20399212
PMCPMC2916024
OpenAlexW2037762175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.