Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20399197›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2010

Molecular imaging and targeted therapies.

David L Morse, Robert J Gillies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular imaging of EGFR/HER2 cancer biomarkers by protein MRI contrast agents.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. TRA-1-60Journal of stem cell research & therapy · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David L MorseH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive SRB-2, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
Robert J Gillies

Funding

Multimeric Ligands for Targeting of MelanomaR01CA097360 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HRUBY, VICTOR J, MORSE, DAVID L · 2003 to 2012
$5.5M
Targeting Pancreatic CancerR01CA123547 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MORSE, DAVID L · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Imaging Biomarkers for Response to Anti-Cancer TherapyR01CA125627 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BAKER, AMANDA F, GILLIES, ROBERT J. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097360NCI NIH HHS R01 CA123547NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted therapeutic and imaging agents are becoming more prevalent, and are used to treat increasingly smaller segments of the patient population. This has lead to dramatic increases in the costs for clinical trials. Biomarkers have great potential to reduce the numbers of patients needed to test novel targeted agents by predicting or identifying non-response early-on and thus enriching the clinical trial population with patients more likely to respond. Biomarkers are characteristics that are objectively measured and evaluated as indicators of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. Biomarkers can be used to predict response to specific therapies, predict response regardless of therapy, or to monitor response once a therapy has begun. In terms of drug development, predictive biomarkers have the greatest impact, as they can be used as inclusion criteria for patient segmentation. Prognostic markers are used routinely in clinical practice but do not provide direction for the use of targeted therapies. Imaging biomarkers have distinct advantages over those that require a biopsy sample in that they are "non-invasive" and can be monitored longitudinally at multiple time points in the same patient. This review will examine the role of functional and molecular imaging in predicting response to specific therapies; will explore the advantages and disadvantages of targeting intracellular or extracellular markers; and will discuss the attributes of useful targets and methods for target identification and validation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenes, ReporterHumansNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20399197
PMCPMC2925390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.