ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2010
Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conclusion of diagnostic odysseys due to inversions disruptingJournal of medical genetics · 2023Article
- Sequence characteristics define trade-offs between on-target and genome-wide off-target hybridization of oligoprobes.PloS one · 2018Article
- Efficient and cost-effective genetic analysis of products of conception and fetal tissues using a QF-PCR/array CGH strategy; five years of data.Molecular cytogenetics · 2017Article
- Identification and functional characterisation of genetic variants in OLFM2 in children with developmental eye disorders.Human genetics · 2017Article
- Microarray experiments and factors which affect their reliability.Biology direct · 2015Review
- Array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) for detection of genomic copy number variants.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015Article
- Article
- The clinical application of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal defects in 20,126 unselected newborns.Molecular cytogenetics · 2013Article
- Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years' clinical application for over 8,700 patients.Molecular cytogenetics · 2013Article
- Expanding probe repertoire and improving reproducibility in human genomic hybridization.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification workflow for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability.Molecular cytogenetics · 2013Article
- Male-biased autosomal effect of 16p13.11 copy number variation in neurodevelopmental disorders.PloS one · 2013Article
- BBGRE: brain and body genetic resource exchange.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- NRXN1 deletions identified by array comparative genome hybridisation in a clinical case series - further understanding of the relevance of NRXN1 to neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of molecular psychiatry · 2013Article
- Array comparative genomic hybridization: results from an adult population with drug-resistant epilepsy and co-morbidities.European journal of medical genetics · 2012Article
- Rare deletions at the neurexin 3 locus in autism spectrum disorder.American journal of human genetics · 2012Article
- Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases.Molecular cytogenetics · 2011Article
- Safety paradigm: genetic evaluation of therapeutic grade human embryonic stem cells.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010Review
- MLPA for confirmation of array CGH results and determination of inheritance.Molecular cytogenetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have demonstrated that array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) for genome-wide imbalance provides a substantial increase in diagnostic yield for patients traditionally referred for karyotyping by G-banded chromosome analysis. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of and strategies for, the use of array CGH in place of karyotyping for genome imbalance, and to report on the results of the implementation of this approach.
resultsFollowing a validation period, an oligoarray platform was chosen. In order to minimise costs and increase efficiency, a patient/patient hybridisation strategy was used, and analysis criteria were set to optimise detection of pathogenic imbalance. A customised database application with direct links to a number of online resources was developed to allow efficient management and tracking of patient samples and facilitate interpretation of results. Following introduction into our routine diagnostic service for patients with suspected genome imbalance, array CGH as a follow-on test for patients with normal karyotypes (n = 1245) and as a first-line test (n = 1169) gave imbalance detection rates of 26% and 22% respectively (excluding common, benign variants). At least 89% of the abnormalities detected by first line testing would not have been detected by standard karyotype analysis. The average reporting time for first-line tests was 25 days from receipt of sample.
conclusionsArray CGH can be used in a diagnostic service setting in place of G-banded chromosome analysis, providing a more comprehensive and objective test for patients with suspected genome imbalance. The increase in consumable costs can be minimised by employing appropriate hybridisation strategies; the use of robotics and a customised database application to process multiple samples reduces staffing costs and streamlines analysis, interpretation and reporting of results. Array CGH provides a substantially higher diagnostic yield than G-banded chromosome analysis, thereby alleviating the burden of further clinical investigations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.