Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20397037›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate neuroscience : IN2009

The effect of opioids and their antagonists on the nocifensive response of Caenorhabditis elegans to noxious thermal stimuli.

F Nieto-Fernandez, S Andrieux, S Idrees, C Bagnall, S C Pryor, R Sood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate neuroscience : IN, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Acute, Sublethal, and Developmental Toxicity of Kratom (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F Nieto-FernandezSUNY College at Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA. nietof@oldwestbury.edu
S Andrieux
S Idrees
C Bagnall
S C Pryor
R Sood
SUNY Old Westbury · US

Funding

The Old Westbury Neuroscience Research InstituteR24MH047392 · NIMH · COLLEGE AT OLD WESTBURY · PI CADET, PATRICK · 1990 to 2006
$3.2M
NIMH COR HONORS UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH TRAININGT34MH017138 · NIMH · COLLEGE AT OLD WESTBURY · PI PRYOR, STEPHEN CARL · 1985 to 2008
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH047392NIMH NIH HHS T34 MH017138PHS HHS 17138PHS HHS 47392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opiates modulate nociception in vertebrates. This has also been demonstrated in a number of invertebrate models. Herein, the effect of the opiate morphine and opioid neuropeptides Endomorphin 1 and 2 on the thermal avoidance (Tav) behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans is explored. Adult wild-type C. elegans N2 were collected from NGM plates using M9 buffer and exposed to morphine and endomorphine 1 and 2 in concentrations between 10(-8) and 10(-4) M (2.5 pmol/mg to 25 nmol/mg) for 30 min and tested for Tav. The opioid receptor antagonists Naloxone and CTOP were tested in combination with the drugs. Forty-seven percentage of the morphine exposed worms exhibited a class I response versus 76% of the control group (P < 0.001). Endomorphin 1 and 2 also caused a statistically significant reduction in class I responses, 36 and 39%, respectively. These effects were reversed with Naloxone and CTOP. Thermonocifensive behavior in C. elegans is modulated by opioids.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsAvoidance LearningCaenorhabditis elegansMorphineNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOligopeptidesAnalgesics, Opioidendomorphin 1endomorphin 2MorphineNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID20397037
PMCPMC2881580
OpenAlexW2036072640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.