ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2010
Is there a place for FET PET in the initial evaluation of brain lesions with unknown significance?
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI combined with PET-CT of different tracers to improve the accuracy of glioma diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2019Pooled it
- Amino acid tracers in PET imaging of diffuse low-grade gliomas: a systematic review of preoperative applications.Acta neurochirurgica · 2018Pooled it
- Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Circulating biomarkers literature in glioma patient populations.Neurosurgical review · 2024Review
- Article
- Clinical applications and prospects of PET imaging in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Therapy Defining at Initial Diagnosis of Primary Brain Tumor-The Role ofBiomedicines · 2023Article
- The Use ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Based on Medical Imaging in Glioma: Current State and Future Challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Lack of association between cortical amyloid deposition and glucose metabolism in early stage Alzheimer´s disease patients.Radiology and oncology · 2021Article
- Feasibility on the Use of Radiomics Features of 11[C]-MET PET/CT in Central Nervous System Tumours: Preliminary Results on Potential Grading Discrimination Using a Machine Learning Model.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Machine learning-based differentiation between multiple sclerosis and glioma WHO II°-IV° using O-(2-[18F] fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Investigation of Cerebral O-(2-[Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Multimodal neuroimaging of gliomatosis cerebri: a case series of four patients.Acta radiologica open · 2020Article
- Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Reference values of physiological 18F-FET uptake: Implications for brain tumor discrimination.PloS one · 2020Article
- Photopenic defects on O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET: clinical relevance in glioma patients.Neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Biopsy Confirmed Glioma Recurrence Predicted by Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Metrics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of the use of O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L: -tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients of a neurological clinic for evaluation of brain lesions newly diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsWe evaluated 88 patients (44 women and 44 men) with a mean age of 50 +/- 19 years who were sent consecutively for evaluation of an intracerebral mass or lesion observed by MRI from 2006 to 2008. Hospitalization was necessary due to neurological clinical symptoms. Images were obtained by PET/CT 30 min after i.v. injection of 185 MBq FET. Coregistration with MRI was done by HERMES workstation.
resultsFET uptake above the cortical level was observed in 60 patients. Neurosurgery was performed in 60 patients (51 with FET-positive imaging); 36 high-grade and 19 low-grade tumours were verified histologically. The sensitivity of FET PET for high-grade tumours (WHO III-IV) was 94% in this setting. Among the low-grade brain tumours (WHO I-II) 13 of 19 were FET positive, which indicates a sensitivity of 68%. Five of ten (50%) astrocytomas I and II could not be visualized by FET. Histological data were not provided for 28 of 88 patients, so the diagnostic approach is based upon longitudinal observation. Radiological and/or clinical control was done at a median of 7 months later. Three patients (all FET positive) died a few months after the examination because of rapid progression of the malignant brain tumour. A malignant entity could be excluded in the other 25 patients. Considering the whole cohort of 88 patients, 43 patients with malignant tumour could be identified, including high-grade glioma, intracerebral lymphoma (n = 1) and metastasis (n = 3). The sensitivity of FET PET for detecting a malignant tumour entity was 93%. We observed two false-positive cases with postischaemic lesions. Remarkably, the two patients with cerebral gliomatosis were false-negative on FET PET imaging. The negative predictive value for a malignant entity was calculated to be 89%.
conclusionOur results indicate a high sensitivity of FET PET for detecting high-grade glioma in patients with neurological symptoms and recently observed brain lesions by MRI. In the setting of evaluating new brain lesions of unknown significance via FET PET a negative image can encourage a wait and see strategy-of course in accordance with the clinical picture and morphological imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.