Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20395537›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2010

Comparison of selective M3 and nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonists on gastrointestinal transit and bowel habits in humans.

Adil E Bharucha, Karthik Ravi, Alan R Zinsmeister

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemico-Biological Profiling ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Desmethylbellidifolin FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  9. Choosing an Animal Model for the Study of Functional Dyspepsia.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adil E BharuchaClinical and Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program (C.E.N.T.E.R.) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA. bharucha.adil@mayo.edu
Karthik Ravi
Alan R Zinsmeister
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
Pathophysiology of Anorectal DisordersR01DK078924 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2008 to 2023
$5.0M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024150NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although in vitro studies show that muscarinic M(3) receptors primarily mediate the effects of acetylcholine on gastrointestinal contractility, the muscarinic receptor subtypes regulating gastrointestinal motor activity and transit in humans in vivo are unclear. We hypothesized that muscarinic M(3)-specific but not nonspecific receptor antagonists would delay gastrointestinal and colonic transit in humans. In this parallel-group study, gastric emptying, small intestinal transit, and colonic transit were assessed by scintigraphy on days 4-6 in 72 healthy subjects (49 women) who received placebo (n = 16), the M(3) antagonist darifenacin ER [7.5 mg (n = 20) or 15 mg daily (n = 17)], or the nonspecific antagonist tolterodine [4 mg daily (n = 19)] for 6 days. Bowel habits were recorded by daily diaries. Both doses of darifenacin substantially delayed [P < 0.01 vs. placebo (for both doses), P < 0.01 vs. tolterodine (for 15 mg)] small intestinal transit, i.e., colonic filling at 6 h (placebo [59.6 +/- 6.4%, mean +/- SE], 7.5 mg ER [34.4 +/- 6.1%], 15 mg ER [20.4 +/- 6.3%)]. Darifenacin (15 mg) also delayed (P < 0.01 vs. placebo and tolterodine) half-time for ascending colonic emptying [placebo (12.0 +/- 1.5 h), 7.5 mg (18.6 +/- 1.9 h), 15 mg (22.9 +/- 2.6 h)] and colonic transit (geometric center) at 24 [placebo (2.8 +/- 0.2), 7.5 mg (2.4 +/- 0.2), 15 mg (1.9 +/- 0.2)] but not 48 h. Darifenacin did not affect gastric emptying and tolterodine did not affect bowel habits or gastrointestinal transit. With muscarinic antagonists used at clinically approved doses, these findings demonstrate that muscarinic M(3) receptors regulate small intestinal and colonic transit in humans; colonic effects are more pronounced in the right than left colon. At doses that affect small and large intestinal transit, M(3) antagonists do not affect gastric emptying in humans. The efficacy of darifenacin in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome should be evaluated.

Indexed as

AdultBenzhydryl CompoundsBenzofuransColonCresolsDefecationFemaleGastric EmptyingGastrointestinal TransitHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsPhenylpropanolaminePyrrolidinesBenzhydryl CompoundsBenzofuransCresolsdarifenacinMuscarinic AntagonistsPhenylpropanolaminePyrrolidinesReceptor, Muscarinic M3Tolterodine Tartrate

Identifiers

PMID20395537
PMCPMC2904119
OpenAlexW2169333949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.