Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20394744›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2010

Mechanisms of retinal ganglion cell injury and defense in glaucoma.

Juan Qu, Danyi Wang, Cynthia L Grosskreutz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Body Metrics and Ocular Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Role of Complement Dysregulation in Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan QuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Howe Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Danyi Wang
Cynthia L Grosskreutz
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Neuroprotection and Retinal Ganglion Cell DeathR01EY013399 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI MASLAND, RICHARD HARRY · 2002 to 2011
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a disease in which retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) die leading ultimately to blindness. Over the past decade and a half, information has begun to emerge regarding specific molecular responses of the retina to conditions of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). It is now clear that the state of the RGC in glaucoma depends on a balance of pro-survival and pro-death pathways in the retina and details of these responses are still being worked out. In this review, we will discuss the evidence supporting the involvement of specific apoptotic cascades as well as the insults that trigger RGC apoptosis. In addition, we will present evidence supporting the existence of endogenous protective mechanisms as well as exogenous neuroprotective strategies.

Indexed as

ApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCalcineurinCalpainCaspasesCell SurvivalCytoprotectionGlaucomaHumansRetinal Ganglion CellsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCalcineurinCalpainCaspases

Identifiers

PMID20394744
PMCPMC3378677
OpenAlexW2005626802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.