Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20394051›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2010

PDF receptor expression reveals direct interactions between circadian oscillators in Drosophila.

Seol Hee Im, Paul H Taghert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A functional clock in only two dorsal clock neurons is sufficient to restore the basal circadian activity pattern ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell type-specific driver lines targeting thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integration of photoperiodic and temperature cues by the circadian clock to regulate insect seasonal adaptations.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  12. A four-oscillator model of seasonally adapted morning and evening activities in Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Life science alliance · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Organismal landscape of clock cells and circadian gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seol Hee ImDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Paul H Taghert

Funding

Washington University Center for Translational NeuroscienceP30NS057105 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2011
$8.7M
Systems and Molecular Neurobiology Training ProgramT32GM008151 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 1985 to 2019
$6.5M
MECHANISMS OF CIRCADIAN CLOCK OUTPUTR01MH067122 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAGHERT, PAUL H · 2003 to 2017
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008151NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067122NIMH NIH HHS R01MH067122NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily rhythms of behavior are controlled by a circuit of circadian pacemaking neurons. In Drosophila, 150 pacemakers participate in this network, and recent observations suggest that the network is divisible into M and E oscillators, which normally interact and synchronize. Sixteen oscillator neurons (the small and large lateral neurons [LNvs]) express a neuropeptide called pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) whose signaling is often equated with M oscillator output. Given the significance of PDF signaling to numerous aspects of behavioral and molecular rhythms, determining precisely where and how signaling via the PDF receptor (PDFR) occurs is now a central question in the field. Here we show that GAL4-mediated rescue of pdfr phenotypes using a UAS-PDFR transgene is insufficient to provide complete behavioral rescue. In contrast, we describe a approximately 70-kB PDF receptor (pdfr) transgene that does rescue the entire pdfr circadian behavioral phenotype. The transgene is widely but heterogeneously expressed among pacemakers, and also among a limited number of non-pacemakers. Our results support an important hypothesis: the small LNv cells directly target a subset of the other crucial pacemaker neurons cells. Furthermore, expression of the transgene confirms an autocrine feedback signaling by PDF back to PDF-expressing cells. Finally, the results present an unexpected PDF receptor site: the large LNv cells appear to target a population of non-neuronal cells that resides at the base of the eye.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutocrine CommunicationBehavior, AnimalBiological ClocksCircadian RhythmDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMotor ActivityMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSignal TransductionTransgenesDrosophila ProteinsPDFR protein, DrosophilaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20394051
PMCPMC2881544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.