Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20393962›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Interventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

Louise Lansbury, Jo Leonardi-Bee, William Perkins, Timothy Goodacre, John A Tweed, Fiona J Bath-Hextall

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07347392 (The Role of Radiotherapy for the Management of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Denmark), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07347392 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Radiotherapy for the Management of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Denmark

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2025 to 2029Enrolled2,900ConditionsNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC), Basal Cell Carcinoma of Skin, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the SkinArmsFollow-up visit at least two years after treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. High-frequency ultrasound for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Optical coherence tomography for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Would Marjolin see it coming? Two unusual cases of squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of surgery case reports · 2018
    Article
  19. p16JAAD case reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Louise LansburyCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2NR.
Jo Leonardi-Bee
William Perkins
Timothy Goodacre
John A Tweed
Fiona J Bath-Hextall
University of Nottingham · GBCochrane · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common skin cancer, and is becoming increasingly common around the world. Left untreated, it may spread to other parts of the body, and, although the risk is low, it may ultimately lead to death. Surgical excision is the first line of treatment for most skin SCCs, although other forms of treatment are also used depending upon the nature and site of the tumour and individual participant factors. A multi-professional approach is therefore required for the management of people with this condition.

objectivesTo assess the effects of treatments for primary non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. SEARCH STRATEGY: In February 2010 we searched for relevant trials in The Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and the ongoing trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for primary SCC of the skin. Inclusion criteria were: adults with one or more histologically proven primary SCCs of the skin which had not metastasised. The primary outcome measures were time to recurrence one to five years after treatment, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes included early treatment failure within six months, number of adverse events by the end of treatment, aesthetic appearance as assessed by the participant and clinician, discomfort to the participant during and after treatment, and death. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (LL, FB-H) independently carried out study selection and assessment of methodological quality and data extraction. MAIN

resultsOne trial involving 65 people was included. This compared the time to recurrence in participants with aggressive skin SCC who were randomised to receive either adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha after surgery with or without radiation treatment, or no adjuvant therapy after their initial treatment. There was no significant difference in time to recurrence of tumour between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals 0.43 to 2.72).Most studies identified from the searches were excluded as they were either uncontrolled case series, did not include participants with invasive primary SCC, or included only participants with recurrent or metastatic disease. AUTHORS'

conclusionsLittle evidence from RCTs comparing the efficacy of different interventions for primary cutaneous SCCs exists. There is a clear need for well-designed randomised studies in order to improve the evidence base for the management of this condition.

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20393962
PMCPMC10816961
OpenAlexW2164355127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.