Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20393959›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Chlorpromazine for psychosis induced aggression or agitation.

Uzair Ahmed, Hannah Jones, Clive E Adams

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Chlorpromazine versus piperacetazine for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Chlorpromazine versus penfluridol for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Chlorpromazine versus clotiapine for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  11. De-escalation techniques for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  12. Chlorpromazine versus metiapine for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  14. Haloperidol for long-term aggression in psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  15. Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  16. Chlorpromazine versus atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Review
  20. Prescription Patterns of Intramuscular Medication for Psychomotor Agitation: A Survey of Italian Psychiatrists.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Uzair AhmedParkside Lodge, Leeds PFT, Leeds, UK, LS12 2AE.
Hannah Jones
Clive E Adams
North Yorkshire County Council · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgitated or violent behaviour constitutes 10% of all emergency psychiatric treatment. Some guidelines do not recommend the use of chlorpromazine for rapid tranquillisation but it is still often used for this purpose.

objectivesTo examine the effects of oral or intramuscular chlorpromazine for psychosis induced agitation or aggression. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (up to July 2009) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised control trials or double blind trials (implying randomisation) comparing chlorpromazine with another drug or placebo for people who are thought to be acutely aggressive or agitated due to psychotic illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a fixed-effects model. MAIN

resultsOne study (total n=30) met the inclusion criteria. When compared with haloperidol (Man 1973) (1 RCT, n=30) people allocated chlorpromazine were no more likely to have one additional injection than those allocated haloperidol (RR 3.00 CI 0.13 to 68.26). This remained true for 2-4 injections (RR 0.90 CI 0.52 to 1.55) and for 5 or more injections (RR 0.75 CI 0.20 to 2.79). Two people allocated chlorpromazine had sudden, serious hypotension while no one allocated haloperidol had such an effect (RR 5.00 CI 0.26 to 96.13). No extrapyramidal symptoms were observed. One person allocated chlorpromazine developed status epilepticus (RR 3.00 CI 0.13 to 68.26). AUTHORS'

conclusionsOverall the quality of evidence is limited, poor and dated. Where drugs that have been better evaluated are available, it may be best to avoid use of chlorpromazine. Where chlorpromazine is used for acute aggression or where choices are limited, relevant trials are possible and urgently needed.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAggressionAntipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazineHaloperidolHumansInjections, IntramuscularPsychomotor AgitationPsychotic DisordersAntipsychotic AgentsChlorpromazineHaloperidol

Identifiers

PMID20393959
PMCPMC12547862
OpenAlexW2106848296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.