SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antenatal interventions to reduce preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.BMC research notes · 2014Pooled it
- Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.BMC public health · 2012Pooled it
- Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009Pooled it
- Cost estimation alongside a multi-regional, multi-country randomized trial of antenatal ultrasound in five low-and-middle-income countries.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- A Case Report of Tubal Pregnancy Complicated with Partial Hydatidiform Mole.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Large-for-Gestational Age and Macrosomia Among Livebirths in 23 Low- and Middle-Income Countries Between 2000 and 2021: An Individual Participant Data Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Prenatal multidisciplinary counseling for fetal congenital anomalies: A narrative review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Technology-Supported Ultrasound Training in Prenatal Diagnosis through an Adaptive Image Recognition Training System (AdaptUS).Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Fetal face shape analysis from prenatal 3D ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Task sharing for increasing access to obstetric ultrasonography: a formative qualitative study of nurse-led scanning with telemedicine review in Kenya.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Thoracic kidney and diaphragmatic hernia: prenatal diagnosis and successful management. Case report and review of the literatureRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2023Article
- Impact of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection on fetal growth during pregnancy.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2023Article
- Article
- A Prospective Study on Correlation of First Trimester Crown-Rump Length With Birth Weight.Cureus · 2022Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks to Improve Fetal Brain Fine-Grained Plane Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Detecting and Monitoring Hydrogels with Medical Imaging.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- Implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21Global health action · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic ultrasound is a sophisticated electronic technology, which utilises pulses of high frequency sound to produce an image. Diagnostic ultrasound examination may be employed in a variety of specific circumstances during pregnancy such as after clinical complications, or where there are concerns about fetal growth. Because adverse outcomes may also occur in pregnancies without clear risk factors, assumptions have been made that routine ultrasound in all pregnancies will prove beneficial by enabling earlier detection and improved management of pregnancy complications. Routine screening may be planned for early pregnancy, late gestation, or both. The focus of this review is routine early pregnancy ultrasound.
objectivesTo assess whether routine early pregnancy ultrasound for fetal assessment (i.e. its use as a screening technique) influences the diagnosis of fetal malformations, multiple pregnancies, the rate of clinical interventions, and the incidence of adverse fetal outcome when compared with the selective use of early pregnancy ultrasound (for specific indications). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (September 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published, unpublished, and ongoing randomised controlled trials that compared outcomes in women who experienced routine versus selective early pregnancy ultrasound (i.e. less than 24 weeks' gestation). We have included quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data for each included study. We used the Review Manager software to enter and analyse data. MAIN
resultsRoutine/revealed ultrasound versus selective ultrasound/concealed: 11 trials including 37505 women. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy reduces the failure to detect multiple pregnancy by 24 weeks' gestation (risk ratio (RR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.17). Routine scan is associated with a reduction in inductions of labour for 'post term' pregnancy (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83). Routine scans do not seem to be associated with reductions in adverse outcomes for babies or in health service use by mothers and babies. Long-term follow up of children exposed to scan in utero does not indicate that scans have a detrimental effect on children's physical or cognitive development. AUTHORS'
conclusionsEarly ultrasound improves the early detection of multiple pregnancies and improved gestational dating may result in fewer inductions for post maturity. Caution needs to be exercised in interpreting the results of aspects of this review in view of the fact that there is considerable variability in both the timing and the number of scans women received.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.