SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Cerebrolysin and Recovery After Stroke (CARS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial.Stroke · 2016Trial
- Association of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- The fate of medications evaluated for ischemic stroke pharmacotherapy over the period 1995-2015.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2016Review
- TLR7 rs2897827 Polymorphism Affects TLR7 Gene mRNA Expression and Serum Apolipoprotein A1 Level of Ischemic Stroke Patients in a Chinese Han Population.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2016Article
- An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Association between angiotensinogen T174M polymorphism and ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2015Review
- Trophic factors and cell therapy to stimulate brain repair after ischaemic stroke.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2012Review
- Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence.Neuropsychology review · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebrolysin is a mixture of low-molecular-weight peptides and amino acids derived from pigs' brain tissue which has proposed neuroprotective and neurotrophic properties. It is widely used in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke in Russia and China.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and risks of cerebrolysin for treating acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2009), EMBASE (1974 to February 2009), LILACS (1982 to February 2009), Science Citation Index (1940 to February 2009), SIGLE Archive (1980 to March 2005), and a number of relevant Russian Databases (1988 to February 2009). We also searched reference lists, ongoing trials registers and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing cerebrolysin with placebo or no treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsWe included one trial involving 146 participants. There was no difference in death (6/78 in the cerebrolysin group versus 6/68 in the placebo group; risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 2.58) or in the total number of adverse events (16.4% versus 10.3%; RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.82) between the treatment and control groups. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to evaluate the effect of cerebrolysin on survival and dependency in people with acute ischaemic stroke. High-quality and large-scale randomised controlled trials may help to gain a better understanding of the potential value of cerebrolysin in acute ischaemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.