Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20393310›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2010

Myriad Genetics: In the eye of the policy storm.

E Richard Gold, Julia Carbone

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Conflicts of interest in genetic counseling: acknowledging and accepting.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Patentability of genes: a European Union perspective.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  14. Phase changes in the BRCA policy domain.Journal of religion and health · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Gene patents: a broken incentives system.Journal of religion and health · 2013
    Review
  19. Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Article
  20. Genetics. Moving beyond "isolated" gene patents.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E Richard GoldMcGill Faculty of Law, McGill University, 3644 Peel Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. richard.gold2@mcgill.ca
Julia Carbone
Duke University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

The Management and Organization Core will be administered by the Center for GenomP50HG003391 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BESKOW, LAURA M. · 2004 to 2014
$9.9M
CIHRNHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the late 1980s, a storm surrounding the wisdom, ethics, and economics of human gene patents has been brewing. The various winds of concern in this storm touched on the impact of gene patents on basic and clinical research, on health care delivery, and on the ability of public health care systems to provide equal access when faced with costly patented genetic diagnostic tests. Myriad Genetics, Inc., along with its subsidiary, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc., a small Utah-based biotechnology company, found itself unwittingly in the eye of this storm after a series of decisions it made regarding the commercialization of a hereditary breast cancer diagnostic test. This case study examine the background to Myriad's decisions, the context in which these decisions were made and the policy, research and business response to them.

Indexed as

GeneticsLaboratoriesBiotechnologyBreast NeoplasmsCommerceFemaleGenesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatents as TopicReagent Kits, DiagnosticUtahReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID20393310
PMCPMC3037261
OpenAlexW1967094772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.