ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2010
Genetic screening: A primer for primary care.
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time poverty of families of children with 22q11DS: a healthcare professional perspective.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Review
- Preconception Care: A Strategic Intervention for the Prevention of Neonatal and Birth Disorders.Cureus · 2023Review
- Article
- Targeted screening in the UK: A narrow concept with broad application.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2022Review
- Homozygous GRHPR C.494G>A mutation is deleterious that causes early onset of nephrolithiasis in West Bengal, India.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Barriers and strategies to integrate medical genetics and primary care in underserved populations: a scoping review.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- How practice setting affects family physicians' views on genetic screening: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Article
- Specialist physicians' referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?F&S reports · 2021Article
- Carrier frequency and predicted genetic prevalence of Pompe disease based on a general population database.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2021Article
- The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease.SSM - population health · 2017Article
- Association study of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with bone mass assessed by quantitative ultrasound in young adults.Rheumatology international · 2017Article
- Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Jumping on the Train of Personalized Medicine: A Primer for Non- Geneticist Clinicians: Part 3. Clinical Applications in the Personalized Medicine Area.Current psychiatry reviews · 2014Article
- Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- Single-step capture and sequencing of natural DNA for detection of BRCA1 mutations.Genome research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo provide a primer for primary care professionals who are increasingly called upon to discuss the growing number of genetic screening services available and to help patients make informed decisions about whether to participate in genetic screening, how to interpret results, and which interventions are most appropriate. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: As part of a larger research program, a wide literature relating to genetic screening was reviewed. PubMed and Internet searches were conducted using broad search terms. Effort was also made to identify the gray literature. MAIN MESSAGE: Genetic screening is a type of public health program that is systematically offered to a specified population of asymptomatic individuals with the aim of providing those identified as high risk with prevention, early treatment, or reproductive options. Ensuring an added benefit from screening, as compared with standard clinical care, and preventing unintended harms, such as undue anxiety or stigmatization, depends on the design and implementation of screening programs, including the recruitment methods, education and counseling provided, timing of screening, predictive value of tests, interventions available, and presence of oversight mechanisms and safeguards. There is therefore growing apprehension that economic interests might lead to a market-driven approach to introducing and expanding screening before program effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility have been demonstrated. As with any medical intervention, there is a moral imperative for genetic screening to do more good than harm, not only from the perspective of individuals and families, but also for the target population and society as a whole.
conclusionPrimary care professionals have an important role to play in helping their patients navigate the rapidly changing terrain of genetic screening services by informing them about the benefits and risks of new genetic and genomic technologies and empowering them to make more informed choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20393090PMC2860823W1962857761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.