Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20393064›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

NMDAR-dependent control of call duration in Xenopus laevis.

Erik Zornik, Abraham W Katzen, Heather J Rhodes, Ayako Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Timescales of call variability in a South American treefrog.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Generation, Coordination, and Evolution of Neural Circuits for Vocal Communication.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  4. Premotor Neuron Divergence Reflects Vocal Evolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Motor Neurons Tune Premotor Activity in a Vertebrate Central Pattern Generator.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Harnessing vocal patterns for social communication.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2014
    Review
  11. The Xenopus amygdala mediates socially appropriate vocal communication signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Coding rate and duration of vocalizations of the frog, Xenopus laevis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  14. Shared developmental and evolutionary origins for neural basis of vocal-acoustic and pectoral-gestural signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik ZornikBiology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ez@bu.edu
Abraham W Katzen
Heather J Rhodes
Ayako Yamaguchi

Funding

Androgen modulation of vocal neuronsR01NS048834 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI YAMAGUCHI, AYAKO · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-048834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many rhythmic behaviors, such as locomotion and vocalization, involve temporally dynamic patterns. How does the brain generate temporal complexity? Here, we use the vocal central pattern generator (CPG) of Xenopus laevis to address this question. Isolated brains can elicit fictive vocalizations, allowing us to study the CPG in vitro. The X. laevis advertisement call is temporally modulated; calls consist of rhythmic click trills that alternate between fast (approximately 60 Hz) and slow (approximately 30 Hz) rates. We investigated the role of two CPG nuclei--the laryngeal motor nucleus (n.IX-X) and the dorsal tegmental area of the medulla (DTAM)--in setting rhythm frequency and call durations. We discovered a local field potential wave in DTAM that coincides with fictive fast trills and phasic activity that coincides with fictive clicks. After disrupting n.IX-X connections, the wave persists, whereas phasic activity disappears. Wave duration was temperature dependent and correlated with fictive fast trills. This correlation persisted when wave duration was modified by temperature manipulations. Selectively cooling DTAM, but not n.IX-X, lengthened fictive call and fast trill durations, whereas cooling either nucleus decelerated the fictive click rate. The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist dAPV blocked waves and fictive fast trills, suggesting that the wave controls fast trill activation and, consequently, call duration. We conclude that two functionally distinct CPG circuits exist: 1) a pattern generator in DTAM that determines call duration and 2) a rhythm generator (spanning DTAM and n.IX-X) that determines click rates. The newly identified DTAM pattern generator provides an excellent model for understanding NDMAR-dependent rhythmic circuits.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsEvoked PotentialsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsIn Vitro TechniquesLaryngeal NervesMedulla OblongataNeuronsPeriodicityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerotoninTemperatureTime FactorsValineVocalization, AnimalXenopus laevis2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acidExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerotoninValine

Identifiers

PMID20393064
PMCPMC2888257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.