Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20392807›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2010

Estrogen actions in the brain and the basis for differential action in men and women: a case for sex-specific medicines.

Glenda E Gillies, Simon McArthur

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 338 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 712 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What do measures of gender identity tell us about gender identity over time?The British journal of developmental psychology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Aromatase enzyme: Paving the way for exploring aromatization for cardio-renal protection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging roles of mJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Glenda E GilliesCentre for Neuroscience, Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, DuCane Road, London W12ONN, UK. g.gillies@imperial.ac.uk
Simon McArthur
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 086871/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classic view of estrogen actions in the brain was confined to regulation of ovulation and reproductive behavior in the female of all mammalian species studied, including humans. Burgeoning evidence now documents profound effects of estrogens on learning, memory, and mood as well as neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes. Most data derive from studies in females, but there is mounting recognition that estrogens play important roles in the male brain, where they can be generated from circulating testosterone by local aromatase enzymes or synthesized de novo by neurons and glia. Estrogen-based therapy therefore holds considerable promise for brain disorders that affect both men and women. However, as investigations are beginning to consider the role of estrogens in the male brain more carefully, it emerges that they have different, even opposite, effects as well as similar effects in male and female brains. This review focuses on these differences, including sex dimorphisms in the ability of estradiol to influence synaptic plasticity, neurotransmission, neurodegeneration, and cognition, which, we argue, are due in a large part to sex differences in the organization of the underlying circuitry. There are notable sex differences in the incidence and manifestations of virtually all central nervous system disorders, including neurodegenerative disease (Parkinson's and Alzheimer's), drug abuse, anxiety, and depression. Understanding the cellular and molecular basis of sex differences in brain physiology and responses to estrogen and estrogen mimics is, therefore, vitally important for understanding the nature and origins of sex-specific pathological conditions and for designing novel hormone-based therapeutic agents that will have optimal effectiveness in men or women.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesEstrogensFemaleHumansHypothalamusLearningMaleMemoryParkinson DiseaseRatsSex FactorsEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID20392807
PMCPMC2879914
OpenAlexW2123640958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.