Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20390437›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: SUV-based assessment.

Nobuyuki Kawai, Hai-Ning Zhen, Keisuke Miyake, Yuka Yamamaoto, Yoshihiro Nishiyama, Takashi Tamiya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Assessing the intracranial metabolic score as a novel prognostic tool in primary CNS lymphoma with end of induction-chemotherapyCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Utility of FDG PET/CT in the Management of Primary Testicular Lymphoma.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Flow-metabolism uncoupling in the cervical spinal cord of ALS patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Primary CNS lymphoma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nobuyuki KawaiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kita-gun, Kagawa, Japan. nobu@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Hai-Ning Zhen
Keisuke Miyake
Yuka Yamamaoto
Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Takashi Tamiya
Kagawa University · JPXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We also investigated whether FDG uptake was related to angiogenesis in the tumors. Seventeen patients with newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed PCNSL were investigated with FDG-PET before the treatment. FDG uptake was assessed by standardized uptake value of the tumor showing the maximum uptake (SUVmax). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the overall and the progression-free survival times. The difference of the survival curves between the low to moderate FDG uptake (SUVmax < 12) and high FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥ 12) groups was statistically analyzed. The relationship between FDG SUVmax and microvessel density (MVD) in the tumor specimens determined by CD34 immunohistochemical staining was examined. Finally, the difference of the overall survival curve between the low MVD (<20) and high MVD (≥ 20) groups was statistically analyzed. After the completion of initial treatment, 7 of the 8 low to moderate FDG uptake patients showed complete response (CR) and 1 showed partial response (PR). On the other hand, 5 of the 9 high FDG uptake patients showed CR and 4 showed PR. However, the difference of treatment response (CR vs PR) between the low to moderate and high FDG uptake groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.36). Median survival time was more than 26 months in low to moderate FDG uptake patients and 12 months in high FDG uptake patients. The overall survival time of patients with low to moderate FDG uptake was significantly longer than that of patients with high FDG uptake (P < 0.05). The progression free survival (PFS) was also significantly longer in patients with low to moderate FDG uptake compared to the patients with high FDG uptake (P < 0.05). There was no significant relationship between FDG SUVmax and MVD in the tumors. The survival time tended to be longer in patients with high MVD than in low MVD, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). Pretreatment FDG uptake may have a prognostic value in newly diagnosed PCNSL.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, CD34Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCranial IrradiationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyAntigens, CD34Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID20390437
OpenAlexW2067814721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.