Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20388893›Full record

ArticleJAMA2010

Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

Suresh B Boppana, Shannon A Ross, Zdenek Novak, Masako Shimamura, Robert W Tolan, April L Palmer, Amina Ahmed, Marian G Michaels, Pablo J Sánchez, David I Bernstein and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05630898 (Congenital Cytomegalovirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05630898 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Congenital Cytomegalovirus: Prevalence in Buenos Aires City

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital de Niños R. Gutierrez de Buenos AiresRan2023 to 2024Enrolled3,000ConditionsCongenital CytomegalovirusArmsCMV PCR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 368 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Suresh B BoppanaUAB Department of Pediatrics, CHB 114, 1600 Sixth Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA. sboppana@peds.uab.edu
Shannon A Ross
Zdenek Novak
Masako Shimamura
Robert W Tolan
April L Palmer
Amina Ahmed
Marian G Michaels
Pablo J Sánchez
David I Bernstein
William J Britt
Karen B Fowler
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders CMV and Hearing Multicenter Screening (CHIMES) Study

Funding

NIDCD NIH HHS N01 DC050008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextReliable methods to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection are needed for identification of infants at increased risk of hearing loss. Since dried blood spots (DBS) are routinely collected for metabolic screening from all newborns in the United States, there has been interest in using DBS polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for newborn CMV screening.

objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of DBS real-time PCR assays for newborn CMV screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsBetween March 2007 and May 2008, infants born at 7 US medical centers had saliva specimens tested by rapid culture for early antigen fluorescent foci. Results of saliva rapid culture were compared with a single-primer (March 2007-December 2007) and a 2-primer DBS real-time PCR (January 2008-May 2008). Infants whose specimens screened positive on rapid culture or PCR had congenital infection confirmed by the reference standard method with rapid culture testing on saliva or urine.

main outcome measuresSensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) of single-primer and 2-primer DBS real-time PCR assays for identifying infants with confirmed congenital CMV infection.

resultsCongenital CMV infection was confirmed in 92 of 20,448 (0.45%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36%-0.55%) infants. Ninety-one of 92 infants had positive results on saliva rapid culture. Of the 11,422 infants screened using the single-primer DBS PCR, 17 of 60 (28%) infants had positive results with this assay, whereas, among the 9026 infants screened using the 2-primer DBS PCR, 11 of 32 (34%) screened positive. The single-primer DBS PCR identified congenital CMV infection with a sensitivity of 28.3% (95% CI, 17.4%-41.4%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100%), positive LR of 803.7 (95% CI, 278.7-2317.9), and negative LR of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6-0.8). The positive and negative predictive values of the single-primer DBS PCR were 80.9% (95% CI, 58.1%-94.5%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 99.5%-99.7%), respectively. The 2-primer DBS PCR assay identified infants with congenital CMV infection with a sensitivity of 34.4% (95% CI, 18.6%-53.2%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%), positive LR of 3088.9 (95% CI, 410.8-23 226.7), and negative LR of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.8). The positive and negative predictive values of the 2-primer DBS PCR were 91.7% (95% CI, 61.5%-99.8%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.6%-99.9%), respectively.

conclusionAmong newborns, CMV testing with DBS real-time PCR compared with saliva rapid culture had low sensitivity, limiting its value as a screening test.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralHumansInfant, NewbornPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSalivaSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20388893
PMCPMC2997517
OpenAlexW2152900899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.