ArticleBMC genomics2010
Novel insights into the genomic basis of citrus canker based on the genome sequences of two strains of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii.
Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking the genetic arsenal of Xanthomonas arboricola: new insights into taxonomic classification, pathogenicity and adaptation beyond the effectorome.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Review
- Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Phyllosphere-Associated Xanthomonas euvesicatoria Bacteria in Physalis pubescens Based on BOX-PCR and ERIC-PCR in China.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Greater than the sum of their parts: an overview of the AvrRps4 effector family.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Core-Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing for Epidemiological and Evolutionary Analyses of Phytopathogenic Xanthomonas citri.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Citrus Canker Pathogen, Its Mechanism of Infection, Eradication, and Impacts.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Isolation and characterization of vB_XciM_LucasX, a new jumbo phage that infects Xanthomonas citri and Xanthomonas fuscans.PloS one · 2022Article
- TheMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- HrpL Regulon of Bacterial Pathogen of Woody HostMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Natural variations of TFIIAγ gene and LOB1 promoter contribute to citrus canker disease resistance in Atalantia buxifolia.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- A Computation Method Based on the Combination of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters to Improve the Discrimination of Visually Similar Phenotypes Induced by Bacterial Virulence Factors.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Article
- Crystal Structure-Based Exploration of Arginine-Containing Peptide Binding in the ADP-Ribosyltransferase Domain of the Type III Effector XopAI Protein.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae XopQ protein suppresses rice immune responses through interaction with two 14-3-3 proteins but its phospho-null mutant induces rice immune responses and interacts with another 14-3-3 protein.Molecular plant pathology · 2019Article
- XopR T3SS-effector of3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Global Regulator PhoP is Necessary for Motility, Biofilm Formation, Exoenzyme Production and Virulence ofGenes · 2019Article
- Genomic sequence analysis reveals diversity of Australian Xanthomonas species associated with bacterial leaf spot of tomato, capsicum and chilli.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Genome sequence of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans strain Xff49: a new isolate obtained from common beans in Southern Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019Article
- Bacteria-Killing Type IV Secretion Systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Analyses of Seven New Genomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCitrus canker is a disease that has severe economic impact on the citrus industry worldwide. There are three types of canker, called A, B, and C. The three types have different phenotypes and affect different citrus species. The causative agent for type A is Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri, whose genome sequence was made available in 2002. Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii strain B causes canker B and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii strain C causes canker C.
resultsWe have sequenced the genomes of strains B and C to draft status. We have compared their genomic content to X. citri subsp. citri and to other Xanthomonas genomes, with special emphasis on type III secreted effector repertoires. In addition to pthA, already known to be present in all three citrus canker strains, two additional effector genes, xopE3 and xopAI, are also present in all three strains and are both located on the same putative genomic island. These two effector genes, along with one other effector-like gene in the same region, are thus good candidates for being pathogenicity factors on citrus. Numerous gene content differences also exist between the three cankers strains, which can be correlated with their different virulence and host range. Particular attention was placed on the analysis of genes involved in biofilm formation and quorum sensing, type IV secretion, flagellum synthesis and motility, lipopolysacharide synthesis, and on the gene xacPNP, which codes for a natriuretic protein.
conclusionWe have uncovered numerous commonalities and differences in gene content between the genomes of the pathogenic agents causing citrus canker A, B, and C and other Xanthomonas genomes. Molecular genetics can now be employed to determine the role of these genes in plant-microbe interactions. The gained knowledge will be instrumental for improving citrus canker control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.