Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20387109›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2010

Mechanisms of very fast oscillations in networks of axons coupled by gap junctions.

Erin Munro, Christoph Börgers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical synaptic and gap junctional interactions between principal neurons: partners in epileptogenesis.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin MunroDepartment of Mathematics and Center for Biodynamics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ecmun@bu.edu
Christoph Börgers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because electrical coupling among the neurons of the brain is much faster than chemical synaptic coupling, it is natural to hypothesize that gap junctions may play a crucial role in mechanisms underlying very fast oscillations (VFOs), i.e., oscillations at more than 80 Hz. There is now a substantial body of experimental and modeling literature supporting this hypothesis. A series of modeling papers, starting with work by Roger Traub and collaborators, have suggested that VFOs may arise from expanding waves propagating through an "axonal plexus", a large random network of electrically coupled axons. Traub et al. also proposed a cellular automaton (CA) model to study the mechanisms of VFOs in the axonal plexus. In this model, the expanding waves take the appearance of topologically circular "target patterns". Random external stimuli initiate each wave. We therefore call this kind of VFO "externally driven". Using a computational model, we show that an axonal plexus can also exhibit a second, distinctly different kind of VFO in a wide parameter range. These VFOs arise from activity propagating around cycles in the network. Once triggered, they persist without any source of excitation. With idealized, regular connectivity, they take the appearance of spiral waves. We call these VFOs "re-entrant". The behavior of the axonal plexus depends on the reliability with which action potentials propagate from one axon to the next, which, in turn, depends on the somatic membrane potential V (s) and the gap junction conductance g (gj). To study these dependencies, we impose a fixed value of V (s), then study the effects of varying V (s) and g (gj). Not surprisingly, propagation becomes more reliable with rising V (s) and g (gj). Externally driven VFOs occur when V (s) and g (gj) are so high that propagation never fails. For lower V (s) or g (gj), propagation is nearly reliable, but fails in rare circumstances. Surprisingly, the parameter regime where this occurs is fairly large. Even a single propagation failure can trigger re-entrant VFOs in this regime. Lowering V (s) and g (gj) further, one finds a third parameter regime in which propagation is unreliable, and no VFOs arise. We analyze these three parameter regimes by means of computations using model networks adapted from Traub et al., as well as much smaller model networks.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsAxonsBiological ClocksBrainComputer SimulationGap JunctionsHumansNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeural PathwaysReaction TimeTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.