ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2010
Mechanisms of very fast oscillations in networks of axons coupled by gap junctions.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biophysical model of striatal microcircuits suggests gamma and beta oscillations interleaved at delta/theta frequencies mediate periodicity in motor control.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Transition Dynamics of a Dentate Gyrus-CA3 Neuronal Network during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Gap junction networks can generate both ripple-like and fast ripple-like oscillations.The European journal of neuroscience · 2014Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of physiological and epileptic HFO generation.Progress in neurobiology · 2012Review
- Axonal properties determine somatic firing in a model of in vitro CA1 hippocampal sharp wave/ripples and persistent gamma oscillations.The European journal of neuroscience · 2012Article
- Shortest Loops are Pacemakers in Random Networks of Electrically Coupled Axons.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2012Article
- Chemical synaptic and gap junctional interactions between principal neurons: partners in epileptogenesis.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2011Article
- Network recruitment to coherent oscillations in a hippocampal computer model.Journal of neurophysiology · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because electrical coupling among the neurons of the brain is much faster than chemical synaptic coupling, it is natural to hypothesize that gap junctions may play a crucial role in mechanisms underlying very fast oscillations (VFOs), i.e., oscillations at more than 80 Hz. There is now a substantial body of experimental and modeling literature supporting this hypothesis. A series of modeling papers, starting with work by Roger Traub and collaborators, have suggested that VFOs may arise from expanding waves propagating through an "axonal plexus", a large random network of electrically coupled axons. Traub et al. also proposed a cellular automaton (CA) model to study the mechanisms of VFOs in the axonal plexus. In this model, the expanding waves take the appearance of topologically circular "target patterns". Random external stimuli initiate each wave. We therefore call this kind of VFO "externally driven". Using a computational model, we show that an axonal plexus can also exhibit a second, distinctly different kind of VFO in a wide parameter range. These VFOs arise from activity propagating around cycles in the network. Once triggered, they persist without any source of excitation. With idealized, regular connectivity, they take the appearance of spiral waves. We call these VFOs "re-entrant". The behavior of the axonal plexus depends on the reliability with which action potentials propagate from one axon to the next, which, in turn, depends on the somatic membrane potential V (s) and the gap junction conductance g (gj). To study these dependencies, we impose a fixed value of V (s), then study the effects of varying V (s) and g (gj). Not surprisingly, propagation becomes more reliable with rising V (s) and g (gj). Externally driven VFOs occur when V (s) and g (gj) are so high that propagation never fails. For lower V (s) or g (gj), propagation is nearly reliable, but fails in rare circumstances. Surprisingly, the parameter regime where this occurs is fairly large. Even a single propagation failure can trigger re-entrant VFOs in this regime. Lowering V (s) and g (gj) further, one finds a third parameter regime in which propagation is unreliable, and no VFOs arise. We analyze these three parameter regimes by means of computations using model networks adapted from Traub et al., as well as much smaller model networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20387109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.